Air Canada Rouge B767-300; What a beater!
I flew home yesterday from FLL via YUL on an Air Canada Rouge B767-300. It's been years since I was in one of these aircraft and I was pretty surprised at how run down it was. What a beater! Also, I had forgotten how small the overhead bins are in these aircraft. I will avoid them in the future.
|
I rather sit in a 767-300 Rogue plus than POS garbage known as Y in 737 MAX or 777HD though
|
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
(Post 30440271)
I rather sit in a 767-300 Rogue plus than POS garbage known as Y in 737 MAX or 777HD though
|
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
(Post 30440439)
After the flight on the 763, I was on a 7M8. According to the AC website, both have 30" pitch, 18" width and 3" recline in the Y cabin. I didn't feel any more cramped in the 7M8 than I did in the 763. The 763 had non-existent room in the overhead bins and non-existent IFE, so the 7M8 is overwhelmingly better. As for the 777HD, according to the AC website, it has 31" pitch, 17" width and 6" recline.) As much as I dislike such a narrow seat, I would even prefer it over the 763. (Haven't the original 777HDs been converted to the new interior at least?)
|
Thread title should be renamed: The 1980s Called and They Want Their 767-300s Back :p |
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
(Post 30440271)
I rather sit in a 767-300 Rogue plus than POS garbage known as Y in 737 MAX or 777HD though
Originally Posted by Jumper Jack
(Post 30440533)
Rogue Plus gives you 35 pitch and a 2-3-2 seating plan beats 3-3 anyday.
|
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
(Post 30440253)
I flew home yesterday from FLL via YUL on an Air Canada Rouge B767-300. It's been years since I was in one of these aircraft and I was pretty surprised at how run down it was. What a beater! Also, I had forgotten how small the overhead bins are in these aircraft. I will avoid them in the future.
Fins 690-4 ,IIRC, have larger bins. These birds came over from Hawaii, again if memory serves me well |
Originally Posted by acysb87
(Post 30441729)
Thought I would dash;) in here and add that not all Rouge J cabin overhead bins are the small type.
Fins 690-4 ,IIRC, have larger bins. These birds came over from Hawaii, again if memory serves me well I’ve read on other forums that all 767s will be outfitted with new bins, but I haven’t heard of an official confirmation of those plans. |
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
(Post 30440253)
I flew home yesterday from FLL via YUL on an Air Canada Rouge B767-300. It's been years since I was in one of these aircraft and I was pretty surprised at how run down it was. What a beater! Also, I had forgotten how small the overhead bins are in these aircraft. I will avoid them in the future.
I have been in worse. |
Still would rather fly Rouge stowage than UA stowage.
|
Originally Posted by RangerNS
(Post 30442107)
Still would rather fly Rouge stowage than UA stowage.
|
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
(Post 30440253)
I flew home yesterday from FLL via YUL on an Air Canada Rouge B767-300. It's been years since I was in one of these aircraft and I was pretty surprised at how run down it was. What a beater! Also, I had forgotten how small the overhead bins are in these aircraft. I will avoid them in the future.
|
Originally Posted by yyznomad
(Post 30440587)
Thread title should be renamed: The 1980s Called and They Want Their 767-300s Back :p |
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
(Post 30451152)
I thought about that, but in the 1980s, they were new, not filthy and run-down.
|
The J/PY hard product is terrible in these planes. Uncomfortable cushioning, narrow, very little space for bags. Really harkens back over a decade. Might be okay for FOTSG leisure flyers on some routes, but I'd much rather be on a narrowbody on anything within North America or to the Caribbean.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.