Last edit by: yyznomad
For those of you interested only in the revised $450-million deal and related discussion, it starts on post 418:
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/1926409-update-aimia-accepts-air-canada-td-cibc-visa-revised-450-million-aeroplan-bid-28.html#post30109427
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/1926409-update-aimia-accepts-air-canada-td-cibc-visa-revised-450-million-aeroplan-bid-28.html#post30109427
Update: Aimia accepts Air Canada, TD, CIBC & Visa revised $450-million Aeroplan bid
#331
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
This has been so widely discussed and debated with no resolution here. However, since the charge is not made on several STAR partners it must be assumed that the YQ originates with the operating airline that insists it is added to the AE redemption, as it is on their own program flight redemptions. Neither AE not AC (except on its own award flights) keeps any of it, or at least should not. Of course several people around here still insist it's a "scam charge" that both AE and AC impose and keeps. If that's the case, I ask doubters why are there exceptions?
#332
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
So this shareholder highly overrates the value of Aeroplan to any entity other than AC. There are investment banks that still see airline FF programs as being under valued while operating as divisions within the airline. At the last investor meeting of AA, one bank was trying to convince them to spin off AAdvantage. As was successfully done when these same banks pretty much forced ACE to divest Aeroplan and Jazz for the "instant" cash payout. This one must be happy to have seen the stock double since the buy out offer, but it's still less than half what they likely bought their shares for.
#333
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
I would love nothing better than to agree with you on this point. However the evidence seems to price that these charges are more than likely scam in nature. For instance using my United Milageplus account I can book award flights on AC, LH and other partners without paying any carrier surcharge. The milage amounts are the same or very similar so it's not explained there and United is also a founding member of the *. Perhaps the split from AC facilitated this change since a * partner wasn't operating the program but even that doesn't make sense. Why do LH Group Swiss flights or UA flights not have this stupidity?
Presumably other airlines sell miles at a higher price so volume is not quite as high and they get value. Which AC does not.
#334
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,916
#335
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
There was some discussion on FT on some of tese issues. Conclusion seemed to be that the contract between AC and AE imposes very low prices for rewards. Plus, given the tons of miles AE sells to banks, CCs etc., the number of seats vastly outnumbers the number of seats expected to go empty.
Presumably other airlines sell miles at a higher price so volume is not quite as high and they get value. Which AC does not.
Presumably other airlines sell miles at a higher price so volume is not quite as high and they get value. Which AC does not.
#336
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
The economy will see a lot more Uberization of food (e.g., Uber Eats) and shared mobility. If Aeroplan were to secure agreements with ride sharing companies like Uber or Lyft, and Airbnb, then they would be well positioned for the future economy, not the past where members filled up their gas guzzlers at the pump before or after filling their trunk with a week's worth of groceries.@:-)
#337
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: YYC
Posts: 4,035
The banks joined AC because they're caught in a trap: their Aeroplan contact runs through 2022 and likely has a clause restricting them from participating in any other loyalty programs. Thus they can't move over to Altitude 2.0 in July 2020, a thus fear losing a large portion of their elite cardholders who will lose AC benefits associated with the cards. And for AC it means Amex can pretty much call the terms of any partnership in Altitude 2.0 since it is likely to be the only bank/credit-charge card entity bidding. (BMO is tied to Air Miles, RBC to WestJet, and AC hates ScotiaBank because it outbid it for naming rights to the Toronto arena.)
Also, saying the banks & Visa joined the bid is presumptuous. They stand to lose 10B+ a year of intercharge, to another bank and Mastercard, and they are both well aware of that and actively trying to prevent it.
#338
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
Also, there are airlines that likely sell miles for well under what Aeroplan is selling such as AV miles where it's not uncommon to encounter promos that make the effective price per mile in the 1 cent range. I don't believe they charge scam charges on their milage redemptions.
#339
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
MUST reading. I urge all to read, It is an eye opener and provides much needed context., Christopher Mittleman has a vested interest but that said, the gentleman knows his business and has provided some much needed transparency that AC and the CC companies have not provided. IMO up until Mittelman and Rabe joined the board, AC and Calin had their way with the Aimia leadership. The new boss Jeremy Rabe knows this business as he was the founder and a managing partner of On Point Loyalty, a boutique investment and advisory firm focused on the airline loyalty industry. Perhaps a bit late to do as much as he can do, but I think he is the right guy for the job and that Calin & Co. have met their match with a guy who chews numbers and spits them out profitably.
At this point, best for them is saving the furniture. My guest remains, they are gambling that AC (not so much) and mostly, TD and CIBC will raise their offer. All about bargaining.
But at the end of the day, it's really TD and CIBC which must care. For AC, not so important if we get upset because of miles get lost. They have AE to blame and not so much business to lose.
#340
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 5,949
Full of BS though. I am sure the guy is smart. But it smells like he is going his best with a losing hand. Ditto for Rabe.
At this point, best for them is saving the furniture. My guest remains, they are gambling that AC (not so much) and mostly, TD and CIBC will raise their offer. All about bargaining.
But at the end of the day, it's really TD and CIBC which must care. For AC, not so important if we get upset because of miles get lost. They have AE to blame and not so much business to lose.
At this point, best for them is saving the furniture. My guest remains, they are gambling that AC (not so much) and mostly, TD and CIBC will raise their offer. All about bargaining.
But at the end of the day, it's really TD and CIBC which must care. For AC, not so important if we get upset because of miles get lost. They have AE to blame and not so much business to lose.
#341
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, Ont., Canada
Programs: Aeroplan; Marriott Platinum; IHG Platinum; Best Western Diamond
Posts: 2,151
To my knowledge, the RFP for the Altitude Card Issuer was very active, and AC has draft agreements for both Canadian and US cards to be issued under the Mastercard banner. I'll leave it to others to opine on who the issuers would be.
Also, saying the banks & Visa joined the bid is presumptuous. They stand to lose 10B+ a year of intercharge, to another bank and Mastercard, and they are both well aware of that and actively trying to prevent it.
Also, saying the banks & Visa joined the bid is presumptuous. They stand to lose 10B+ a year of intercharge, to another bank and Mastercard, and they are both well aware of that and actively trying to prevent it.
#342
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: YYC
Posts: 4,035
AC is ready to sign a deal anytime, and this offer is probably the only way it isn't MC branded.
#343
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC, UA, IHG, SPG, Carlson
Posts: 193
Very interesting, but doesn't discuss the fact that in order to 'create' the $2.6B valuation, AC endowed, to AP, the right to redeem points on AC (and its Star Alliance partners under reciprocity arrangements). It does not discuss the distributions paid to shareholders. It does not discuss the substantially changed investment climate since the spin-off. Namely that assets cannot be packaged/engineered into 'income trusts' and sold for obscene P/E multiples.
#344
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC, UA, IHG, SPG, Carlson
Posts: 193
1. AC calculated it was worth the risk (of people getting angry at them) when they decided the non-renewal last year. Not buying AE back now does not add additional such risk.
2. Consumers can blame AC all they want but they don't really have a choice. WestJet? Maybe in the future but not now.
3. Does it really matter even if people perceive that AC screwed them on their past AE miles? For high spend travellers, as long as AC's new loyalty program benefit is "good" (or just better than WestJet's non-existent program), they will stick with AC vs WestJet. For bottom feeders buying lowest economy only, doesn't matter how much AC screwed them in the past, if a ticket today from AC is $10 cheaper than WestJet, they will buy AC.
#345
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Air Canada Super Elite 2+ Million Miles
Posts: 2,478
Three things to say to counter your argument:
1. AC calculated it was worth the risk (of people getting angry at them) when they decided the non-renewal last year. Not buying AE back now does not add additional such risk.
2. Consumers can blame AC all they want but they don't really have a choice. WestJet? Maybe in the future but not now.
3. Does it really matter even if people perceive that AC screwed them on their past AE miles? For high spend travellers, as long as AC's new loyalty program benefit is "good" (or just better than WestJet's non-existent program), they will stick with AC vs WestJet. For bottom feeders buying lowest economy only, doesn't matter how much AC screwed them in the past, if a ticket today from AC is $10 cheaper than WestJet, they will buy AC.
1. AC calculated it was worth the risk (of people getting angry at them) when they decided the non-renewal last year. Not buying AE back now does not add additional such risk.
2. Consumers can blame AC all they want but they don't really have a choice. WestJet? Maybe in the future but not now.
3. Does it really matter even if people perceive that AC screwed them on their past AE miles? For high spend travellers, as long as AC's new loyalty program benefit is "good" (or just better than WestJet's non-existent program), they will stick with AC vs WestJet. For bottom feeders buying lowest economy only, doesn't matter how much AC screwed them in the past, if a ticket today from AC is $10 cheaper than WestJet, they will buy AC.
and AirMiles tried something small and got hammered
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/air...logy-1.4003988
I can just see all the stories about how lost miles are stealing from avg hard working middle class Canadians for the fat cat corporate types.
ps...did you notice “middle-class” - a favourite reference by the current PM to who he is supporting by all his actions against the wealthy
dump truck load of popcorn anyone?