Possible actions when Air Canada denies clothing damage without convincing arguments
#31
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
I wasn't thinking about going to courts until it got mentioned. I was curious to know if someone had previously been in a similar predicament and would be able to let me know how a complaint can be "escalated" at this point in the process.
I admit it would be a lot of time spent on just $40. But hey, at least I made them work for more than this amount already. It would be a good start for AC to save money in the future...
...or fix the darn tables...
I admit it would be a lot of time spent on just $40. But hey, at least I made them work for more than this amount already. It would be a good start for AC to save money in the future...
...or fix the darn tables...
sometimes this route has helped us........ from an executive standpoint......seriously for $40 is it worth pissing a legitimate premium customer off?
suggest writing a nice factual letter to them with your ticket/booking reference details
good luck
ght
#32
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
OP said in post #11 that the principle was now the prime motivation. Not for anyone else to judge.
People who say it is the principle use that to justify endless efforts to get the money, in this case $40.00. Had there been no loss of $40, there would be not talk about principle.
I had a job many, many years ago that involved taking many cases to Small Claims Court, I can assure anyone thinking about it not to bother for such a picayune amount. It would be frankly an embarassment to show up in front of a court to argue about $40.00.
#33
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,324
This is FT--of course we are going to judge.
People who say it is the principle use that to justify endless efforts to get the money, in this case $40.00. Had there been no loss of $40, there would be not talk about principle.
I had a job many, many years ago that involved taking many cases to Small Claims Court, I can assure anyone thinking about it not to bother for such a picayune amount. It would be frankly an embarassment to show up in front of a court to argue about $40.00.
People who say it is the principle use that to justify endless efforts to get the money, in this case $40.00. Had there been no loss of $40, there would be not talk about principle.
I had a job many, many years ago that involved taking many cases to Small Claims Court, I can assure anyone thinking about it not to bother for such a picayune amount. It would be frankly an embarassment to show up in front of a court to argue about $40.00.
This is where companies need to be held accountable. If every customer just bends over because "it's only $40", then the company will continue to screw everyone.
#34
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: AC
Posts: 2,167
This is FT--of course we are going to judge.
People who say it is the principle use that to justify endless efforts to get the money, in this case $40.00. Had there been no loss of $40, there would be not talk about principle.
I had a job many, many years ago that involved taking many cases to Small Claims Court, I can assure anyone thinking about it not to bother for such a picayune amount. It would be frankly an embarassment to show up in front of a court to argue about $40.00.
People who say it is the principle use that to justify endless efforts to get the money, in this case $40.00. Had there been no loss of $40, there would be not talk about principle.
I had a job many, many years ago that involved taking many cases to Small Claims Court, I can assure anyone thinking about it not to bother for such a picayune amount. It would be frankly an embarassment to show up in front of a court to argue about $40.00.
Also, I shouldn't need to repeat this but I feel like the point was lost in this thread. The original "damages" that was initially "so called" claimed by the plaintiff was the $40 drycleaning bill. Ultimately time and energy was spent pursuing this case, and if it were me and I took it to small claims court, I would be claiming significantly more than $40.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
#36
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,568
Not for nothing, and directly relating to the OP, but I noticed that the 737MAX trays up front, when half-open, are very easy to flip over.
Would AC have ordered such bad trays if they had to pay out a bunch of $40's? (after thousands on in-house council, even?)
Would AC have ordered such bad trays if they had to pay out a bunch of $40's? (after thousands on in-house council, even?)
#37
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
And do they? I have not seen a raft of complaints on FT about this topic.
#38
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,324
And if by "this topic", you mean "AC owes me money and refuses to pay", then yes, I've seen dozens/hundreds of complaints.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
They seats probably looked good on the pictures; maybe they sat and liked it. But details such as tray tables? I bet that sort of issue did not even cross their mind.
#40
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYJ/DXB/OGG
Programs: EK-Skywards Gold / Delta Gold Medallion/E50K 1MM
Posts: 753
Yes, about 4 years ago I was travelling International on a full "J" ticket, the SD took my sports coat to hang up, while closing the closet apparently my sleeve was caught in the tracks and they just forced it closed ripping my sleeve from elbow to wrist. It was a tailored Hugo Boss jacket that cost me $850. The SD was very apologetic and assured me that AC would replace the jacket. She made a note on a form with the details and submitted it to AC. I called AC when i was able, probably 2 days later. They informed me that they were limited to $250 maximum. I sent them receipts and photos of the jacket. I was an SE MM at the time and I was astounded that they were fighting me on this, I fought them for about a month and finally gave up and took there $250. I am now E50K MM and travel about 2500 miles a year on AC, the rest of my flying is now on Emirates and Delta. I travel about 7 times a year to Dubai from YYJ and have never been happier.
#41
Join Date: May 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC e75K, *G, SPG/MR PPE
Posts: 315
i was SHOCKED i filled out the online claim form 2 weeks ago and AC replied in 72 hours with $500 for deflating seat. So perhaps AC has started to improve its customer complaints department after Gabor has created a web site showing people how to get AC to pay for "issues"
Regardless its a very positive step that AC is no longer saying please wait for 90 days.
Regardless its a very positive step that AC is no longer saying please wait for 90 days.
Seems like that's not the case here.