Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Air Canada ranks dead last among large NA carriers for On-Time Performance, Again

Air Canada ranks dead last among large NA carriers for On-Time Performance, Again

Old Mar 28, 2018, 7:23 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Dont think so. Lots of carriers schedule much tighter turnarounds, and utilize their fleet more efficiently. Southwest comes to mind (for those who still claim weather is to blame). As does Ryanair with their 30 minute turns and 88% on time performance.
30-minute turns are easy if you pad your block times enough.

I flew 8 segments with DL in the last couple of weeks. Every flight was early, but the block times were incredibly padded. Which, of course, I don’t mind as a customer.

I really don’t know why AC doesn’t do something similar with their own schedules...

Last edited by ffsim; Mar 28, 2018 at 8:27 pm Reason: Pad, not paid.
ffsim is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2018, 7:49 pm
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
Originally Posted by ffsim

I really don’t know why AC doesn’t do something similar with their own schedules...
Perhaps because if maintaining same time on the ground between scheduled arrival and scheduled departure, plane unitilzation would go down significantly?
Stranger is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2018, 7:51 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
Originally Posted by Stranger
Perhaps because if maintaining same time on the ground between scheduled arrival and scheduled departure, plane unitilzation would go down significantly?
Sure, it’s possible. I mean, there must be a reason.

But if you’re consistently late — to the point where you’re typically in-line with EF’s historical reliability numbers — the plane isn’t getting used anyway.
ffsim is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2018, 7:51 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,742
Originally Posted by ffsim
I flew 8 segments with DL in the last couple of weeks. Every flight was early, but the block times were incredibly padded.
I looked at YYZ-ATL, as both AC and DL offer non stop flights. I wouldn't call the DL schedule "incredibly padded" relative to the AC one.
Jagboi is online now  
Old Mar 28, 2018, 7:52 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
Originally Posted by Jagboi
I looked at YYZ-ATL, as both AC and DL offer non stop flights. I wouldn't call the DL schedule "incredibly padded" relative to the AC one.
I didn’t fly YYZ-ATL.
ffsim is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2018, 7:05 am
  #66  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
Originally Posted by ffsim


30-minute turns are easy if you pad your block times enough.

I flew 8 segments with DL in the last couple of weeks. Every flight was early, but the block times were incredibly padded. Which, of course, I don’t mind as a customer.

I really don’t know why AC doesn’t do something similar with their own schedules...
They not only do something similar, on a lot of routes, they do it better

Look at the previous page, AC pads just as much as everyone else, on domestics vs westjet, on transborders vs DL,AA,UA and on transatlantics vs BA and others.
The "others pad their schedules" argument is simply not true, and easily debunked by a simple 2 second google search. For every route you find the competition with a 5 minute longer block time, I can find you an AC route where they pad MORE than their competition




rankourabu is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2018, 7:22 am
  #67  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: yyz/ord
Programs: AC E50 UA1k 2MM AA EXP Royal Ambassador SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,516
Some posters just won't believe AC is last

Some try to blame it on snow, bad weather, other airlines pad flight timest, eventually those poster go to other threads.
Realistically, AC just does not care because most of it's customers are trapped .
DrunkCargo likes this.
flybit is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2018, 7:54 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,999
Originally Posted by tcook052
AS is over 85% OTP and they fly to snowy Alaska.
I'm guessing only 10% of AS departures are to/from Alaska. Not exactly congested airports.
A quick spray and they're off.

Keep in mind, when it's really cold it doesn't snow. De icing not required unless it's an overnight.
tracon is online now  
Old Mar 30, 2018, 1:12 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 334
Remove Canadian Airlines International (rest their beloved soul) from the commercial airline mix in Canada, allow Air Canada to create a monopoly, and this is what you get (and the cold shoulder from Air Canada employees, because you are nothing but a "nuisance" passenger. You know, to the vast majority of Air Canada employees, Air Canada passengers are nothing but a nuisance,.

Last edited by H3A3H3; Mar 30, 2018 at 6:33 am
H3A3H3 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2018, 9:32 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Halifax
Programs: AC SE100K, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Elite. NEXUS
Posts: 4,562
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Dont think so. Lots of carriers schedule much tighter turnarounds, and utilize their fleet more efficiently. Southwest comes to mind (for those who still claim weather is to blame). As does Ryanair with their 30 minute turns and 88% on time performance.
Both airlines only fly one type of aircraft (each). It's far fewer things for flight, ground and operations crews to think about and plan for.
RangerNS is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2018, 8:46 am
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293


A huge improvement for AC in March. Still dead last with NA carriers of course, but up to 67% in March. Must feel good to finally beat out Air India and PIA!
rankourabu is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2018, 9:19 am
  #72  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: yyz/ord
Programs: AC E50 UA1k 2MM AA EXP Royal Ambassador SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,516
Wow, so AC is still last in NA! https://www.flightstats.com/company/...orts/airlines/
It would be nice if the CBC would report this.
flybit is offline  
Old May 11, 2018, 7:42 am
  #73  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
Congratulations to Air Canada, they are now 2nd worst in North America for April 2018. Almost up to 70% on time!
On the world stage, they've proudly beat out all star airlines like PK, MS and AI.

rankourabu is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2018, 11:37 am
  #74  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: Only J via Peasant Points, 777HDPeasant or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance and Narcissism.
Posts: 5,949
Credit where credit is due, congrats to the OPs people.

AC mananges to reach 79.8% OTP for the month of May (on par with legacy carriers of US)

Benchmark:
West Jet: 87.3%
American: 78.4%
Delta: 84.5%
United: 79%

Here's to hope AC has managed to crawl out of the hole and shall never return to 50% OTP ever again.
https://www.oag.com/hubfs/Monthly_OT...6-a4b0abab0217

Perhaps thread title should be changed to "Monthly AC OTP Results and Discussion"? (Just an idea) @tcook052

Last edited by Jumper Jack; Jun 24, 2018 at 11:43 am
Jumper Jack is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2018, 11:47 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: YVR
Programs: Ice Cream Club, AC SE MM, Bonvoy Life Plat
Posts: 2,803
I hope safety and service are not compromised to achieve this boost in OTP.
DrunkCargo is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.