Introducing Air Canada Basic Economy
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: YOW, LHR, SIN
Programs: AC-SE, EK-G, GF-G
Posts: 674
Introducing Air Canada Basic Economy
This cannot be real, https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/...in-canada.html I don't like it one bit.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
This cannot be real, https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/...in-canada.html I don't like it one bit.
Seems to maintain same prices for baggage and I don’t see mention of carry on restrictions ala UA though.
I’m going to assume this also blocks any chance of an eUp too. Presumably there is a press release or did AC IT his the release button in error (again).
Last edited by jc94; Feb 20, 2018 at 9:37 am Reason: spelling
#4
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YQB
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,139
#5
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: AC E50k, A3*G, UA*S, MR Titanium, HHonors Gold, Carlson Gold, NEXUS
Posts: 3,669
Looooool
The interesting thing is that if they introduce this as a branded fare (K...BE, M....BE) they're incentivizing frequent flyers moving away from AP or whatever loyalty program will exist in 2020. UA doesn't care if you have M FL/TG. Both are credited equally.
And from what I can tell, if I fly 1-2 times a year, what's the difference between BE, TG, and FL other than price? This is just an excuse for AC to charge more and deliver less.
But I'm happy to be proven wrong
The interesting thing is that if they introduce this as a branded fare (K...BE, M....BE) they're incentivizing frequent flyers moving away from AP or whatever loyalty program will exist in 2020. UA doesn't care if you have M FL/TG. Both are credited equally.
And from what I can tell, if I fly 1-2 times a year, what's the difference between BE, TG, and FL other than price? This is just an excuse for AC to charge more and deliver less.
But I'm happy to be proven wrong
Last edited by pewpew; Feb 20, 2018 at 9:27 am
#7
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: AC E75K, WJ Gold, NEXUS, Marriott Gold
Posts: 316
At least you can pay to select a seat... unlike UA.
But who am I kidding, the people who buy these wouldn't pay anyways and would just complain that they're left with the middle seat between two land-whales. LOL
But who am I kidding, the people who buy these wouldn't pay anyways and would just complain that they're left with the middle seat between two land-whales. LOL
#9
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC-SE100K, AC-3MM, Marriott- LT Titanium, SPG RIP
Posts: 2,958
My guess is all fares will go up over the short term and Basic Economy will end up being charged at the current Tango rates.
Ancillary fees generated $1B in revenue last year, so looks like they are looking to increase that number.
Could be ok for the not-frequent traveler, though I believe they will end up just paying the same as current Tango but get less included.
Just more confusion for the masses, especially with the recent branded fare changes.
Ancillary fees generated $1B in revenue last year, so looks like they are looking to increase that number.
Could be ok for the not-frequent traveler, though I believe they will end up just paying the same as current Tango but get less included.
Just more confusion for the masses, especially with the recent branded fare changes.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,103
This cannot be real, https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/...in-canada.html I don't like it one bit.
Seriously. You should have to be able to pass an IQ test to fly.
#11
#12
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Quebec and Ontario, Canada
Programs: AC*E50, SPG/Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,917
#13
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
My guess is all fares will go up over the short term and Basic Economy will end up being charged at the current Tango rates.
Ancillary fees generated $1B in revenue last year, so looks like they are looking to increase that number.
Could be ok for the not-frequent traveler, though I believe they will end up just paying the same as current Tango but get less included.
Just more confusion for the masses, especially with the recent branded fare changes.
Ancillary fees generated $1B in revenue last year, so looks like they are looking to increase that number.
Could be ok for the not-frequent traveler, though I believe they will end up just paying the same as current Tango but get less included.
Just more confusion for the masses, especially with the recent branded fare changes.
Or I can spend $204 on taxes with AP. Or I can go AA and pay $35 on Avios. In J.
Haven’t been to T3 since 2015. I don’t see myself darkening T1s door more than once in 2018.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: FOTSG Tangerine Ex E35k (AC)
Posts: 5,612
#15
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, ON
Programs: AC 75K
Posts: 6,363
I can’t see any fares on AC yet (or a press release) but am 99% sure than my $185 YYZ ORD Tango flight will become $185 (or more) for EB and significantly more for Tango and at the cost of Flex I may as well buy P.
Or I can spend $204 on taxes with AP. Or I can go AA and pay $35 on Avios. In J.
Haven’t been to T3 since 2015. I don’t see myself darkening T1s door more than once in 2018.
My guess is these fares will be only on Swoop/
Last edited by ChrisA330; Feb 20, 2018 at 9:52 am