Yay! More domestic Rouge
#61
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,271
I hate to be the nerd that points out just how awful the state of journalistic writing has become, but this passage is just so poor I have to make an example of it.
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
Maybe they plan on hiring David Copperfield.
#62
Join Date: May 2012
Location: YXE
Programs: AC*100K MM, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 222
No. Very bad idea. Someone needs to work on convincing AC that YXE-YYZ needs a minim frequency but does not have sufficient traffic to fill a high density A319. It needs to go to C-series. The rouge A319 need to stay off routes I fly from time to time. Perhaps the route should go back to the CRJ 705 or whatever it is called these days.
#63
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YQT
Programs: AC, US, AA, UA, BA, QF, DL...
Posts: 463
A Jazz captain told a friend of mine that there were plans to replace one of the 6 daily Q400 flights on YQT-YYZ with Rouge. We’ve often wondered why this route hasn’t been upgauged since some of those flights are always packed. Maybe it wasn’t financially viable or allowed contractually with mainline, but it works with Rouge somehow. Initially I was excited because I thought we’d finally have J seats on the route, but now I suspect we’ll get the all-Y configuration.
#64
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: YYG
Programs: airlines and hotels and rental cars - oh my!
Posts: 2,994
And that "premium long haul" service? How are you enjoying the 777HD? That's the future boys and girls, the only difference between AC's "premium long haul" and domestic rouge will be the colour of paint on the outside of the plane.
Remember, it's ALL about Calin's bonus. AC couldn't give a flying f*ck about any of you folks.
My one regret? Looks like I'll continue to see even more AC luggage tags on my Westjet flights. Damn.
#65
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YQB
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,139
I would rather fly in a Jazz Q400 Y seat with a higher frequency than a Rouge (or ML!) J seat with lower frequency for any flight less than two hours.
Rouge taking over the YQB-YYZ route means that I will now have a least one more night one the road for just about every trip I take since they will be axing the earliest and latest daily flight of the schedule.
That’s the tragedy in my book. I honestly couldn’t care less about seat pitch, wider/comfier seat, red or white plane if it means I will be sleeping away from my family a dozen additional nights per year.
Best case scenario, I will still get home the same day but will lose half a day of work and get to enjoy longer layovers in YYZ Dom MLL.
Rouge taking over the YQB-YYZ route means that I will now have a least one more night one the road for just about every trip I take since they will be axing the earliest and latest daily flight of the schedule.
That’s the tragedy in my book. I honestly couldn’t care less about seat pitch, wider/comfier seat, red or white plane if it means I will be sleeping away from my family a dozen additional nights per year.
Best case scenario, I will still get home the same day but will lose half a day of work and get to enjoy longer layovers in YYZ Dom MLL.
#66
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
I hate to be the nerd that points out just how awful the state of journalistic writing has become, but this passage is just so poor I have to make an example of it.
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
So yeah, it could be done.
#67
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,314
I did
#68
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 6,222
I hate to be the nerd that points out just how awful the state of journalistic writing has become, but this passage is just so poor I have to make an example of it.
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
"Ben Smith, president of passenger airlines at Air Canada, said Rouge Airbus A320s and 321s can be converted to high density single class cabins or possibly another airplane type such as the Boeing 737 Max."
Now granted, this is from YAHOO finance, so it's not quite the NYT or WAPO, but seriously?
I note no one commented on your comment willflyforfood. I suspect they missed your point. I too would like to see how Air Canada could convert an A320 or A321 into a Boeing 737 Max.
Maybe they plan on hiring David Copperfield. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAI_Lsor8vk
Maybe they plan on hiring David Copperfield. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAI_Lsor8vk
Where's C-FTJP?
#69
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YQT
Programs: AC, US, AA, UA, BA, QF, DL...
Posts: 463
Here why I think the model works:
1. Pilots and cabin crews will like it - Mainline crews all move up to widebodies, which I believe pay better. Rouge crews get more route options and an expanded employee pool (= more seniority for current staff). Make it a gradual transition so mainline crews upgauge with international capacity growth or are reduced through attrition without the need for layoffs. All new hires go to expand Rouge until the transition is complete and the mainline employee pool is "right-sized".
2. Fleet segregation - Mainline operates the 777, 787, and A330. Rouge operates the 767, 737, A32X, and CSeries.
3. AC Express savings - Cheaper domestic operations with Rouge reduce the cost advantage of the regional carriers. That means AC gets to put the screws to Chorus, Sky Regional, etc. when their contracts come up for renewal.
4. Product commonality - Flying on mainline? You get lie-flat seats in J and seat-back IFE. Flying on Rouge? You get recliners and streaming IFE (they'll eventually pull it off the 737s to save money).
5. Premium cabin reductions - Many of the current 2-cabin A32Xs will be replaced by 1-cabin 737s, probably with "Euro-business" (blocked middle seats) up front. I predict AC's new FFP will offer free elite upgrades to these seats to lure people in from AP, but to keep costs down the hot meals in Premium Rouge will be replaced by free selections from the BOB cart a la WS Plus.
#70
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 3,396
I think you're close but not quite right. I see Rouge eventually taking over all narrowbody flights including the "low-end" intercontinental routes like DUB operated by the 737. Mainline evolves into an exclusively widebody carrier operating the big intercontinental routes as well as a few premium transcon and positioning flights that need widebody service. Basically, we'll end up with a model like QF in Australia where the international and domestic operations were split into separate divisions back around 2012.
Here why I think the model works:
1. Pilots and cabin crews will like it - Mainline crews all move up to widebodies, which I believe pay better. Rouge crews get more route options and an expanded employee pool (= more seniority for current staff). Make it a gradual transition so mainline crews upgauge with international capacity growth or are reduced through attrition without the need for layoffs. All new hires go to expand Rouge until the transition is complete and the mainline employee pool is "right-sized".
2. Fleet segregation - Mainline operates the 777, 787, and A330. Rouge operates the 767, 737, A32X, and CSeries.
3. AC Express savings - Cheaper domestic operations with Rouge reduce the cost advantage of the regional carriers. That means AC gets to put the screws to Chorus, Sky Regional, etc. when their contracts come up for renewal.
4. Product commonality - Flying on mainline? You get lie-flat seats in J and seat-back IFE. Flying on Rouge? You get recliners and streaming IFE (they'll eventually pull it off the 737s to save money).
5. Premium cabin reductions - Many of the current 2-cabin A32Xs will be replaced by 1-cabin 737s, probably with "Euro-business" (blocked middle seats) up front. I predict AC's new FFP will offer free elite upgrades to these seats to lure people in from AP, but to keep costs down the hot meals in Premium Rouge will be replaced by free selections from the BOB cart a la WS Plus.
Here why I think the model works:
1. Pilots and cabin crews will like it - Mainline crews all move up to widebodies, which I believe pay better. Rouge crews get more route options and an expanded employee pool (= more seniority for current staff). Make it a gradual transition so mainline crews upgauge with international capacity growth or are reduced through attrition without the need for layoffs. All new hires go to expand Rouge until the transition is complete and the mainline employee pool is "right-sized".
2. Fleet segregation - Mainline operates the 777, 787, and A330. Rouge operates the 767, 737, A32X, and CSeries.
3. AC Express savings - Cheaper domestic operations with Rouge reduce the cost advantage of the regional carriers. That means AC gets to put the screws to Chorus, Sky Regional, etc. when their contracts come up for renewal.
4. Product commonality - Flying on mainline? You get lie-flat seats in J and seat-back IFE. Flying on Rouge? You get recliners and streaming IFE (they'll eventually pull it off the 737s to save money).
5. Premium cabin reductions - Many of the current 2-cabin A32Xs will be replaced by 1-cabin 737s, probably with "Euro-business" (blocked middle seats) up front. I predict AC's new FFP will offer free elite upgrades to these seats to lure people in from AP, but to keep costs down the hot meals in Premium Rouge will be replaced by free selections from the BOB cart a la WS Plus.
#71
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
I am with you on all points except the last. They are currently standardizing on 4 row J cabins -- my prediction is this is the standard to differentiate from WS go forward. Without it, they don't have enough differentiation to retain a strangle hold on the business travel market. And I do think they can sell 25-50% of their J cabin as actual revenue; half of that for pax transiting to an international flight, half for people on OPM who actually pay for it/afford it. My other prediction is that the number of preferred seats in Y will be significantly reduced to compensate (reduced from the initially much larger pool we are saying on the 737 Max to 2 -3 rows).
The J customer base is not really the business traveler these days, its the people of size, the clausterphobic, the hockey players, politicians and public servants, etc., who really don't have any other choice and for which sitting in Y is not an option whatsoever no matter the cost.
#72
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,761
5. Premium cabin reductions - Many of the current 2-cabin A32Xs will be replaced by 1-cabin 737s, probably with "Euro-business" (blocked middle seats) up front. I predict AC's new FFP will offer free elite upgrades to these seats to lure people in from AP, but to keep costs down the hot meals in Premium Rouge will be replaced by free selections from the BOB cart a la WS Plus.
Meals, not sure. I don't really care though, the snack box on WS Plus is better than any hot meal AC has ever served me in North America.
#73
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YQT
Programs: AC, US, AA, UA, BA, QF, DL...
Posts: 463
I am with you on all points except the last. They are currently standardizing on 4 row J cabins -- my prediction is this is the standard to differentiate from WS go forward. Without it, they don't have enough differentiation to retain a strangle hold on the business travel market. And I do think they can sell 25-50% of their J cabin as actual revenue; half of that for pax transiting to an international flight, half for people on OPM who actually pay for it/afford it. My other prediction is that the number of preferred seats in Y will be significantly reduced to compensate (reduced from the initially much larger pool we are saying on the 737 Max to 2 -3 rows).
#74
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I think bigger routes serving hubs and non-widebody transcons will retain J cabins, but smaller routes will go to a single-cabin config with "Euro-business". So the international connecting passenger on YWG-YYZ or business traveller on YVR-YUL will get proper J, but the person flying YWG-YEG will not. This is similar in a way to the LH model where all flights not going to/from MUC or FRA are operated by their low-cost Germanwings subsidiary.