Air Canada 777 at Melbourne, Florida; anyone know what it's doing here?
#16
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
#17
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: AC E50K *G - Amtrak SelectPlus
Posts: 231
Most United planes use Panasonic which I've always experienced much better performance than with Gogo, even with 2Ku.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC SEMM; AA,DL, Hyatt and Starwood. Ex-status:SQ PPS,CSA,Hilton,AA,UA
Posts: 743
I'm sorta with with vernonc. Yes, there are times when not having internet during a long flight is annoying. But by and large in my work I find it helpful that people know I'm on planes a lot, and that on planes one is often disconnected. Therefore when I don't answer instantly, they assume that's quite likely the case, even if it's actually that I merely choose to parcel out my time and not answer every email within minutes if I'm doing something that requires real thought. So I'm not convinced that widespread wifi on longhaul flights will be all rainbows and ponies.
#19
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
I'm sorta with with vernonc. Yes, there are times when not having internet during a long flight is annoying. But by and large in my work I find it helpful that people know I'm on planes a lot, and that on planes one is often disconnected. Therefore when I don't answer instantly, they assume that's quite likely the case, even if it's actually that I merely choose to parcel out my time and not answer every email within minutes if I'm doing something that requires real thought. So I'm not convinced that widespread wifi on longhaul flights will be all rainbows and ponies.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
#22
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: YYC
Programs: AC-E50K, *G, WS-Gold, Nexus, HH-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, Hertz-PC
Posts: 182
#23
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
#24
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,648
#25
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
#26
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: YYC
Programs: AC-E50K, *G, WS-Gold, Nexus, HH-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, Hertz-PC
Posts: 182
#27
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: YVR
Programs: Bottom feeder Star Gold
Posts: 2,652
Maybe that ferry flight isn't that expensive after all.
Originally Posted by Dorian
Awesome only for the widebodies.
For the 7M8 it means these things are going to be sent over oceans, reducing comfort levels to distant destinations.
For the 7M8 it means these things are going to be sent over oceans, reducing comfort levels to distant destinations.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
#29
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
Of course it's cheaper to fly the tech to the airplane. But then you have to fly the other couple dozen techs, all their tools, manuals, testing equipment, house and feed them for the duration and build them a hangar in which they can go about their install work.
Maybe that ferry flight isn't that expensive after all.
.....
Maybe that ferry flight isn't that expensive after all.
.....
- No STC holder in Canada
- Work visa's that would be required for the techs - as there are no Canadian qualified techs.
- The techs would need to obtain TCCA AME certification
- Current AME's and their unions would be crying foul over bringing in foreign techs (if that were even permitted) instead of having local AME's trained and certified for the work.
Since this is a one-shot install, there is little financial reason for AC to go through the hassle, time and expense to obtain the STC and train their AME's for the Wi-Fi install that would never be done again.
There are reasons why AMO/MRO's specialize in certain types of STC work - it's cheaper to have these types of one-off STC work done my an AMO/MRO instead of by the operator maintenance organization.
Operator maintenance organizations are great for performing regular maintenance on their aircraft, AMO/MRO's are great for one-off and irregular specialized maintenance and STC activities.
#30
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,919
Of course it's cheaper to fly the tech to the airplane. But then you have to fly the other couple dozen techs, all their tools, manuals, testing equipment, house and feed them for the duration and build them a hangar in which they can go about their install work.
Maybe that ferry flight isn't that expensive after all.
.
Maybe that ferry flight isn't that expensive after all.
.