At least 3 types of people here on AC FT, in terms of the Amadeus move.
Group 1: Uh oh, I've got AC flights booked on Nov 18 or 19. Should I run and hide? Cancel and book elsewhere? Group 2: Oooooh, exciting. I'll book some Nov 18 or 19 flights and for fun, see what happens. Maybe get some codes and coupons if stuff breaks. Group 3: Just added popcorn to the grocery list. Plan on watching from the comfort of home. :D |
Originally Posted by YYT82
(Post 31702023)
That goes against everything I have learned through experience. Whenever a misconnect or delays take place, I am thinking alternative creative routing and compensations. :D
Joking aside, I think you are underestimating AC's ability to screw up the switch to Amadeus. If Sopwith hasn't booked his flights, I would suggest going with WS during the first week of the switch over. I, on the other hand, already have flights committed during that window. I cross my fingers hoping that if there are problems, that AC gives me extra compensation EC261 style. :D Minimum Levels of CompensationAirlines will be required to pay passengers compensation for flight delays or cancellations that are in their control and not related to safety. Passengers will be entitled to compensation based on the length of delay at arrival at their final destination:Length of delay. Amount (CAD) 3-6 hours $400 6-9 hours $700 9+ hours $1000
Originally Posted by Fiordland
(Post 31702091)
Or go with the raccoon we all know they are resourceful critters than can get things done. If you get stuck their at least the in-flight service is better.
AC it is questionable but workable during normal operations. While doing a major upgrade, its is crap shoot.
Originally Posted by SparseFlyer
(Post 31702141)
Better not IROP on that day. Especially with OAL flights.
Anything pure AC I wouldn't worry cause agents can loose match coupons anyway. A quick glimpse at the *A employee guide offers some ideas: Q: How do I handle an IRROP situation when another operating flight has been cancelled and a passenger is coming to me? A: Comply with "You get it - you fix it" principle, reaching the operating carrier if needed in order to solve a customer's problem at first point of contact. Realistically, I think this will go smoothly. Name one major IT project AC has undertaken in the last 5 years that has been an unmitigated disaster? Sure AC has had minor hiccups such as with leap years but by and large it's been very minor issues all things considered. Meanwhile DL, AA and most notably British Airways have all had IT meltdowns during normal operations!
Originally Posted by 24left
(Post 31702159)
At least 3 types of people here on AC FT, in terms of the Amadeus move.
Group 1: Uh oh, I've got AC flights booked on Nov 18 or 19. Should I run and hide? Cancel and book elsewhere? Group 2: Oooooh, exciting. I'll book some Nov 18 or 19 flights and for fun, see what happens. Maybe get some codes and coupons if stuff breaks. Group 3: Just added popcorn to the grocery list. Plan on watching from the comfort of home. Safe Travels, James |
Paper MCOs... that will be fun.
At least for US flights AC will be able to 240 pax with scrap paper! |
Originally Posted by 24left
(Post 31702159)
At least 3 types of people here on AC FT, in terms of the Amadeus move.
Group 1: Uh oh, I've got AC flights booked on Nov 18 or 19. Should I run and hide? Cancel and book elsewhere? Group 2: Oooooh, exciting. I'll book some Nov 18 or 19 flights and for fun, see what happens. Maybe get some codes and coupons if stuff breaks. Group 3: Just added popcorn to the grocery list. Plan on watching from the comfort of home. :D |
Originally Posted by SparseFlyer
(Post 31702141)
Better not IROP on that day. Especially with OAL flights.
Anything pure AC I wouldn't worry cause agents can loose match coupons anyway. 1. LGA GA+concierge couldn't resolve it, central concierge took an hour, I missed my flight 2. SFO concierge couldn't resolve it, notified YVR, who called me to ask if it had been resolved, and ended up sending a concierge to meet me on arrival with a FIM I can't even imagine how this would work for a non-SE. And the first situation there had a ticket that matched the PNR. The second was after a SDC. |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31702208)
...
Realistically, I think this will go smoothly. Name one major IT project AC has undertaken in the last 5 years that has been an unmitigated disaster? Sure AC has had minor hiccups such as with leap years but by and large it's been very minor issues all things considered. Meanwhile DL, AA and most notably British Airways have all had IT meltdowns during normal operations! "... Air Canada recorded an impairment charge of $68 million related to previously capitalized costs incurred in the development of a new reservation system.." |
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31703891)
My experiences with COUPON REQUIRED have been much much much more challenging than you lead me to believe. The two instances that come to mind:
1. LGA GA+concierge couldn't resolve it, central concierge took an hour, I missed my flight 2. SFO concierge couldn't resolve it, notified YVR, who called me to ask if it had been resolved, and ended up sending a concierge to meet me on arrival with a FIM I can't even imagine how this would work for a non-SE. And the first situation there had a ticket that matched the PNR. The second was after a SDC. A 55yo GA with 30 years experience might be able to resolve it, directly, with a few keystrokes. Or issue a new ticket, and not GAF about the paperwork being right when the BSP does its thing. And a $15/hr YYZ concierge who knows how to do exactly the 13 things they were taught, without any understanding of what those even are, would be lost without an hour long phone call to the helpdesk. |
Originally Posted by RangerNS
(Post 31704414)
I think its going to be highly dependent on the exact person you get.
A 55yo GA with 30 years experience might be able to resolve it, directly, with a few keystrokes. Or issue a new ticket, and not GAF about the paperwork being right when the BSP does its thing. And a $15/hr YYZ concierge who knows how to do exactly the 13 things they were taught, without any understanding of what those even are, would be lost without an hour long phone call to the helpdesk. The problem with the concierges and customer service has nothing to do with their age or lack of experience and everything to do with the training program (or lack there of) that the company has instituted. I'm 31 and probably know more than most people sitting behind the desk when it comes to *A policies because I took the time to read the manual carefully and understand how the policy and procedures work.
Originally Posted by robsaw
(Post 31703908)
OK, I'm going outside 5 years BUT, I'd suggest a major IT project is a "disaster" when it is cancelled prior to ever being made operational. From 2009:
"... Air Canada recorded an impairment charge of $68 million related to previously capitalized costs incurred in the development of a new reservation system.." Safe Travels, James |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31705382)
OK Boomer.
|
I'm too old to say "ok boomer".
And I'm younger than j2simpso. |
Originally Posted by robsaw
(Post 31703908)
OK, I'm going outside 5 years BUT, I'd suggest a major IT project is a "disaster" when it is cancelled prior to ever being made operational. From 2009:
"... Air Canada recorded an impairment charge of $68 million related to previously capitalized costs incurred in the development of a new reservation system.." |
Originally Posted by RangerNS
(Post 31705997)
I'd have to be 20 years older to be a Boomer
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31706063)
I'm too old to say "ok boomer".
And I'm younger than j2simpso. |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31705382)
told me to pound sand.
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31705382)
actually issue the compensation.
In Cow's situation, the Concierge wanted to help, and was on the phone for an hour actually helping. |
In terms of the daily ops - you shouldn't see any impact at the airport initially. This is because the DCS is not transferring at the same time. DCS can integrate pretty well with any Reservations database and thus it should basically be seamless.
I would expect that there is a shadow in Amadeus already for all RES III bookings - thus the transition will be smooth. Where you will see real issues is for calling reservations and needing to get anything done that is more than basic. They will have a hard time with changes to itineraries, ticket exchanges, repricing, etc. This will also creat big backup in the call centres and so unless you are SE - expect the call centres to be completely overwhelmed . . because everything will just take longer. I think I heard that DCS will also move in stages based on location. Some international locations won't change for a few months. Given that DCS can talk to any other DCS - this is not such a big deal either. |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31705382)
And how many passengers were impacted by this IT project? Zero based on what you've said. AC is more conservative (to a fault perhaps) when it comes to rolling out new IT systems and suspect it will be no different with this one. They will certainly have contingencies on hand. Yes, AC has had few total IT disasters but they have effectively created many call-centre disasters by the lack of online capabilities to handle what many of their competitors can do online. The failure to manage and implement IT modernization isn't conservatism (i.e. appropriate risk management) but is merely applying bandages to an every increasingly complex and aging monster. |
Anyone remember Polaris ? AC has been trying forever to replace RES 3
https://atwonline.com/operations/air...vations-system |
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
(Post 31711097)
Anyone remember Polaris ? AC has been trying forever to replace RES 3
https://atwonline.com/operations/air...vations-system AC and ITA were just overly ambitious in trying to develop a new and revolutionary reservation and departure control system from scratch and at the same time trying to defy the traditional paradigms of most legacy systems in the market place. As such the by project failed. This time they are using Amadeus, an out of the box legacy system but with many improvements that have been a proven solution already in use by most of AC’s Star Alliance partners. |
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
(Post 31711097)
Anyone remember Polaris ? AC has been trying forever to replace RES 3
https://atwonline.com/operations/air...vations-system One thing I forgot to ask is how the Amadeus rollout would impact flights booked with érrorPlan that are solely partner operated flights. I've got an érrorPlan booking for myself and my parents for January that is all on UA metal and has a UA booking code. If Amadeus goes sideways would that impact the ticket or that I should be worried about? -James |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31713114)
I think many people on this forum would consider Polaris to be a major success from an IT standpoint. Not a single passenger was impacted by the rollout of the system.
One thing I forgot to ask is how the Amadeus rollout would impact flights booked with érrorPlan that are solely partner operated flights. I've got an érrorPlan booking for myself and my parents for January that is all on UA metal and has a UA booking code. If Amadeus goes sideways would that impact the ticket or that I should be worried about? -James Just don't make any changes after the migration (or be very cautious afterwards) and you should be fine. If you need to make any changes, try to do so before the migration. There's a chance that after the RES III PNR is migrated over to a new Amadeus PNR, that the original "link" between the UA segment in the RES III PNR and the actual live segment in UA's SHARES PNR is "severed" and not properly "reconnected" to the migrated segment in the Amadeus PNR (perhaps due to teletype failure during the "data merge" process etc). If making a change and the original the UA segment is "cancelled" and rebooked into a new UA flight in Amadeus after the migration, there is a chance that the original UA segment in UA's SHARES PNR would remain uncancelled (due to severed link) and show along with the newly rebooked segment. This would result in a "duplicate booking" on UA's side while everything looks fine in Amadeus (with only the new segment showing). The errorplan agents would then keep insisting that everything is fine while UA would say that you have a duplicate booking. |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31713114)
I think many people on this forum would consider Polaris to be a major success from an IT standpoint. Not a single passenger was impacted by the rollout of the system.
|
Originally Posted by daniellam
(Post 31713673)
As long as the reservation is showing and the e-ticket number is attached to the segments on UA's side, there is nothing to worry about. Note that the e-tickets are stored in a separate e-ticket database that isn't really part of the main AC reservation system.
Just don't make any changes after the migration (or be very cautious afterwards) and you should be fine. If you need to make any changes, try to do so before the migration. There's a chance that after the RES III PNR is migrated over to a new Amadeus PNR, that the original "link" between the UA segment in the RES III PNR and the actual live segment in UA's SHARES PNR is "severed" and not properly "reconnected" to the migrated segment in the Amadeus PNR (perhaps due to teletype failure during the "data merge" process etc). If making a change and the original the UA segment is "cancelled" and rebooked into a new UA flight in Amadeus after the migration, there is a chance that the original UA segment in UA's SHARES PNR would remain uncancelled (due to severed link) and show along with the newly rebooked segment. This would result in a "duplicate booking" on UA's side while everything looks fine in Amadeus (with only the new segment showing). The errorplan agents would then keep insisting that everything is fine while UA would say that you have a duplicate booking. |
Originally Posted by canadiancow
(Post 31703891)
My experiences with COUPON REQUIRED have been much much much more challenging than you lead me to believe. The two instances that come to mind:
1. LGA GA+concierge couldn't resolve it, central concierge took an hour, I missed my flight 2. SFO concierge couldn't resolve it, notified YVR, who called me to ask if it had been resolved, and ended up sending a concierge to meet me on arrival with a FIM I can't even imagine how this would work for a non-SE. And the first situation there had a ticket that matched the PNR. The second was after a SDC. Amadeus, Amadeus, Amadeus Amadeus, Amadeus, Amadeus Amadeus, Amadeus, oh, oh, oh Amadeus Come and rock me, Amadeus |
Luckily for me my flights that week are morning of 18th and afternoon of 22nd. I will just miss whatever stupidity unfolds on the 19th.
|
Originally Posted by RangerNS
(Post 31707760)
My suggestion is that the younger ones don't know how to do obscure things, not that they don't want too. We don't have enough information to know if your blue hair had the ability. I'll grant they did not GAF.
Originally Posted by daniellam
(Post 31713673)
As long as the reservation is showing and the e-ticket number is attached to the segments on UA's side, there is nothing to worry about. Note that the e-tickets are stored in a separate e-ticket database that isn't really part of the main AC reservation system.
Just don't make any changes after the migration (or be very cautious afterwards) and you should be fine. If you need to make any changes, try to do so before the migration. There's a chance that after the RES III PNR is migrated over to a new Amadeus PNR, that the original "link" between the UA segment in the RES III PNR and the actual live segment in UA's SHARES PNR is "severed" and not properly "reconnected" to the migrated segment in the Amadeus PNR (perhaps due to teletype failure during the "data merge" process etc). If making a change and the original the UA segment is "cancelled" and rebooked into a new UA flight in Amadeus after the migration, there is a chance that the original UA segment in UA's SHARES PNR would remain uncancelled (due to severed link) and show along with the newly rebooked segment. This would result in a "duplicate booking" on UA's side while everything looks fine in Amadeus (with only the new segment showing). The errorplan agents would then keep insisting that everything is fine while UA would say that you have a duplicate booking. |
Originally Posted by WaytoomuchEurope
(Post 31717047)
Luckily for me my flights that week are morning of 18th and afternoon of 22nd. I will just miss whatever stupidity unfolds on the 19th.
|
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31717145)
And my argument is the younger ones don’t know all the rules making it easier for us elites to pull the wool over their eyes :p
One follow up question: what would happen for aUA award ticket containing solely an AC flight particularly in the event of IRROPs ? Again I’ve got UA and AC PNRs? Granted these flights are in January but in case all the doom and gloomers are correct. Amadeus would then send an "update" to UA (based on the "received from" field data) with a messaging containing the new Amadeus Record Locator. Once this happens, any UA agent who pulls up the UA PNR would see the Amadeus record locator instead of the former AC record locator. During IRROPs on AC's side, assuming the airport you are departing from has already migrated their DCS (Departure Control System) to Amadeus Altea, there is no need for the agent to update the reservation/PNR. You are simply "transferred" to another flight within the DCS with just a few mouse clicks in the Altea DCS interface. The under relying reservation remains untouched (this means you won't get rebooked to full "J" or "Y" as your original award booking class of "I" or "X" will show on the DCS side). However, for airports not yet on Amadeus Altea DCS, you would need to be manually rebooked in Amadeus (reservations side) before you can be given a new boarding pass. |
Originally Posted by YYT82
(Post 31717164)
The transition starts on the 18th. I purposely booked my flights for that week to see what breaks the system.
|
Originally Posted by trek604
(Post 31717206)
I have flights on the 17th, 18th and 19th... Should be fun times...
The "big migration" that everyone is talking about is only for the reservations side of things. Airport operations (Departure Control System or DCS) will be migrated in batches (airport by airport on different days) to Altea Customer Management (name for the new DCS) and check-in will still be done using the old DCS (the only difference is that the "Additions and Deletions List" or ADL and "Passenger Names List" or PNL is being "uploaded" to the old DCS from Amadeus reservations as opposed to the old reservations system when check-in for a flight opens) until the airport is migrated. |
Originally Posted by daniellam
(Post 31717231)
As long as you don't make any changes during those days (I believe AC is going to have a blackout period where you won't be able to make any new bookings or changes anyway), then you should be fine.
The "big migration" that everyone is talking about is only for the reservations side of things. Airport operations (Departure Control System or DCS) will be migrated in batches (airport by airport on different days) to Altea Customer Management (name for the new DCS) and check-in will still be done using the old DCS (the only difference is that the "Additions and Deletions List" or ADL and "Passenger Names List" or PNL is being "uploaded" to the old DCS from Amadeus reservations as opposed to the old reservations system when check-in for a flight opens) until the airport is migrated. |
I assume eups would be affected then?
|
Originally Posted by trek604
(Post 31717258)
I assume eups would be affected then?
|
Originally Posted by YYT82
(Post 31717256)
12 hours blackout period is what I was told. I'm going to do a SDC at the airport to see if it's possible, or if it will break horribly.
Are you sure it's confirmed for full 12h? I thought I read up thread it's scheduled for 2, but up to 12 allocated just in case. 12 hours of reservations potentially going to OALs is a lot of money. |
Originally Posted by SparseFlyer
(Post 31717351)
12 hours of black out is a very very very long time for airport / reservations operations.
Are you sure it's confirmed for full 12h? I thought I read up thread it's scheduled for 2, but up to 12 allocated just in case. 12 hours of reservations potentially going to OALs is a lot of money. For passengers who desperately need to travel last minute at the most expensive fare, they can always show up at the airport and fly as a "Go Show" (no reservation) passenger. They just get listed in DCS without a reservation. Whether AC will actually allow this is another story. |
Originally Posted by daniellam
(Post 31717358)
Airport operations are unaffected.
For passengers who desperately need to travel last minute at the most expensive fare, they can always show up at the airport and fly as a "Go Show" (no reservation) passenger. They just get listed in DCS without a reservation. Whether AC will actually allow this is another story. |
Originally Posted by yyznomad
(Post 31717427)
Is this the same as "GOSHO"? If so, I thought that was related to the flat tire rule. (I'm genuinely curious)
|
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 31714814)
Success? Rollout? Polaris was abandoned before it ever went into use and AC swallowed a big loss in the process. More here.
|
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
(Post 31717808)
Sorry for triggering a few on here ! Haven't they been trying to replace RES 3 since the early 2000's ?
I even remember sending a message (DM) on Twitter as a concerned passenger to the Amadeus asking their sales team to reach out to Air Canada a couple years ago! |
Originally Posted by YYT82
(Post 31717164)
The transition starts on the 18th. I purposely booked my flights for that week to see what breaks the system.
|
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 31714814)
Success? Rollout? Polaris was abandoned before it ever went into use and AC swallowed a big loss in the process. More here.
Originally Posted by YYT82
(Post 31717164)
The transition starts on the 18th. I purposely booked my flights for that week to see what breaks the system.
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
(Post 31717808)
Sorry for triggering a few on here ! Haven't they been trying to replace RES 3 since the early 2000's ?
Originally Posted by daniellam
(Post 31717845)
Yup :-)
I even remember sending a message (DM) on Twitter as a concerned passenger to the Amadeus asking their sales team to reach out to Air Canada a couple years ago! |
Originally Posted by j2simpso
(Post 31720361)
...
Here's to hoping you luck into some IDB compensation and are rebooked into a generous fare code :p .... Note: LH uses the same system, and when upgrades are processed within the DCS, the new boarding pass still shows the original fare code (eg. Y, B, H, V, Q etc.) but with a new seat assignment in Business Class. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:48 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.