Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Branded Fares; AC changes booking classes/fare classes for Tango & Flex

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Oct 2, 2017, 8:39 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: canadiancow
What are Branded Fares?

Branded Fares (also called Fare Families) are the concept of airlines grouping fares together that share the same characteristics - for example, penalties (changes, refunds), baggage allowance, seat selection (none, paid, or free), mileage accrual, in-flight meals, priority airport services (boarding, check-in) etc.

Air Canada's Branded Fares: The Past

Air Canada has long utilised the concept of Branded Fares, primarily in its Economy Cabin. At present, there are three brands that people are familiar with: Tango, Flex, and Latitude.

In the past, AC has used other brands, including Tango Plus, Latitude Plus, Leisure, Tourist, and Relax & Return.

Until late September 2017, the fare brand was exclusively controlled by the 'booking class' (also called fare class, or the more technical term RBD - reservation booking designator) on each flight segment.

Air Canada's current Economy fare structure is: Y B M U H Q V W G S T L A K

Latitude is Y B
Flex was M U H Q V (W G for domestic and US flights)
Tango was (W G for international fights) S T L A K.

For example, if you were booking an itinerary within Canada or between Canada and the US, and wanted a Flex fare, all you needed to worry about was that each flight was booking in G or higher.

Air Canada's Branded Fares: The Present

On 19 September 2017 at its Investor Day, Air Canada announced that it will be utilising the concept of Branded Fares much more.

All Air Canada fares in all markets have been assigned a 'brand code' as follows:

- Basic: BA
- Standard: TG
- Flex: FL
- Comfort: CO
- Latitude: LT
- Premium Economy Lowest: PL
- Premium Economy Flexible: PF
- Business Class Lowest: EL
- Business Class Flexible: EF

For domestic and US transborder fares, the brand code will appear at the end of the fare basis code (i.e. V3WCTG, V3WCFL etc.). On international fares, while the fares are assigned the brand codes within reservation systems, they will generally not appear on the fare basis code.

For flights within Canada and between Canada and the US, booking classes M U H Q V W G S T L K G will now be used for both Standard and Flex fares, in three possible ways:

1. A distinct separation will remain (i.e. M U H Q V W G always as Flex, S T L K G always as Standard)
2. Some booking classes will overlap (i.e. M U H Q V W G as Flex, and V W G S T L K G as Standard - V W G overlap the two brands)
3. All booking classes are both Flex and Standard.

Air Canada may change how they file fares in a specific market at any point in time.

An example for Toronto to Timmins is included below, showing how Standard and Flex fares are available through all booking classes:

Code:
YTO-YTS CXR-AC WED 01NOV17 CAD
 
 AC-ACK/TG - TANGO
 AC YTOYTS 01NOV17
 V FARE BASIS BK FARE TRAVEL-TICKET AP MINMAX RTG
 1 A21ZATG A X 77.00 R15DE T22SE 21/1 -/ - 100
 2 L21ZATG L X 92.00 R15DE T22SE 21/1 -/ - 100
 3 T14WLATG T X 123.00 ---- 14/1 -/ - 100
 4 T14ZLATG T X 129.00 ---- 14/1 -/ - 100
 5 S10WLATG S X 154.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 6 S10ZLATG S X 159.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 7A G10WLATG G X 176.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 8A G10ZLATG G X 183.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 9A G5ZLATG G X 209.00 ---- 5/1 -/ - 100
 10A W7WLATG W X 228.00 ---- 7/1 -/ - 100‡
 11A W7ZLATG W X 234.00 ---- 7/1 -/ - 100‡
 12A G0ZLATG G X 239.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 13A V3WLATG V X 276.00 ---- 3/1 -/ - 100
 14A V3ZLATG V X 281.00 ---- 3/1 -/ - 100
 15A V0WLATG V X 293.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 16A V0ZLATG V X 303.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 17A Q0ZLATG Q X 330.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 18A H0ZLATG H X 389.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 19A U0ZLATG U X 430.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 20A M0ZLATG M X 500.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 
 AC-ACK/FL - FLEX
 AC YTOYTS 01NOV17
 V FARE BASIS BK FARE TRAVEL-TICKET AP MINMAX RTG
 21A A21ZAFL A X 117.00 R15DE T22SE 21/1 -/ - 100
 22A L21ZAFL L X 132.00 R15DE T22SE 21/1 -/ - 100
 23A T14WLAFL T X 163.00 ---- 14/1 -/ - 100
 24A T14ZLAFL T X 169.00 ---- 14/1 -/ - 100
 25A S10WLAFL S X 194.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100‡
 26A S10ZLAFL S X 199.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100‡
 27I G10WLAFL G X 216.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 28I G10ZLAFL G X 223.00 ---- 10/1 -/ - 100
 29I G5ZLAFL G X 249.00 ---- 5/1 -/ - 100
 30I W7WLAFL W X 268.00 ---- 7/1 -/ - 100
 31I W7ZLAFL W X 274.00 ---- 7/1 -/ - 100
 32I G0ZLAFL G X 279.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 33I V3WLAFL V X 316.00 ---- 3/1 -/ - 100
 34I V3ZLAFL V X 321.00 ---- 3/1 -/ - 100
 35I V0WLAFL V X 333.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 36I V0ZLAFL V X 343.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 37I Q0ZLAFL Q X 370.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 38I H0ZLAFL H X 429.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 39I U0ZLAFL U X 470.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 40I M0ZLAFL M X 540.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 
 AC-ACK/LT - LATITUDE
 AC YTOYTS 01NOV17
 V FARE BASIS BK FARE TRAVEL-TICKET AP MINMAX RTG‡
 41 B0ALT B X 594.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100‡
 42 Y0ALT Y X 655.00 ---- -/‡ -/ - 100
 43 Y Y X 1764.00 ---- - -/ - 1
 
 AC-ACK/EF - BUSINESS FLEXIBLE
 AC YTOYTS 01NOV17
 V FARE BASIS BK FARE TRAVEL-TICKET AP MINMAX RTG
 44 J J‡X 1964.00 ---- - -/ - 1
 
 1* TRAVEL MUST BE NONSTOP OR DIRECT
 100* 1. YTO-YTS
How do I make sure I'm booking the fare type I want?

If booking on Air Canada's website, choosing the fare type in the search results should give you a fare in that category, regardless of the booking class letter.

Otherwise, you will need to check the fare basis codes for all flights on your ticket to ensure they should the correct suffix (TG for Standard, FL for Flex).

If you book flights using a corporate booking tool such as Concur or GetThere, you may want to check with your travel administrator that the site is properly configured to display the branded fares according to brand code and not booking class.

What about milage accrual on Aeroplan?

The Aeroplan website has not yet been updated to reflect accrual, however you should expect to earn miles based on the fare type purchased (i.e. a domestic Flex K fare should earn 100% and a Standard M fare should earn 25%).

What about milage accrual on other programmes?

No data is currently available to support this, but in the absence of changes listed by the respective programme, the expectation is flights will continue to earn on those programmes based on the booking class letter.

What about milage accrual to Aeroplan when the flight is booked as a codeshare (i.e. UA*AC) and operated by Air Canada?

No data is currently available to know what happens. Codeshares map to specific booking class letters, not fares.

What about international fares?

There have currently been no changes to international fares. Branding of these fares still exists, but Air Canada has a lot less flexibility in filing fares in specific markets (for example, Transatlantic fares that are covered by the A++ Joint Venture).

How can my travel agent book branded fares?

AC has a guide here which describes how a TA can book TG or FL branded fares: https://www.aircanada.com/content/da...de_v1.0_EN.pdf

Air Canada's Branded Fares: The Future

On 19 September 2017 at its Investor Day, Air Canada also announced it may introduce a new "ULCC" fare brand below Tango to respond to markets in which it faces competition from Ultra Low Cost Carriers, as well as a "Comfort" brand between Flex and Latitude. Watch this space for future developments.
Print Wikipost

Branded Fares; AC changes booking classes/fare classes for Tango & Flex

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2017, 3:16 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,648
Originally Posted by YHZ_Flyer
Crazy differentials, and it seems as Tango G & W prices are similar to what was formally Flex G & W. So essentially paying the same amount for less amenities.
For my ongoing YYC-YVR example, it is a $100 Tango to Flex price differential. Or a more than 50% increase in price ($180-190 Tango to $280-290 Flex).
Diabeetus is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2017, 3:32 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,648
Originally Posted by Stranger
Allow people who care about the real overall price to include "ancillaries" in the ticket price, perhaps at some discount compared with lower fare + equivalent various surcharges.
Call me cynical, but I don't expect the "buy up" to be at a discount - judging by the premium AC charges on most routes between Tango and Flex, this is likely a way for AC to extract an even bigger premium from people who don't want the lowest possible fare.
The Lev is online now  
Old Sep 23, 2017, 3:38 pm
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
Originally Posted by The Lev
Call me cynical, but I don't expect the "buy up" to be at a discount - judging by the premium AC charges on most routes between Tango and Flex, this is likely a way for AC to extract an even bigger premium from people who don't want the lowest possible fare.
My point was, it may be at a (small) discount if you compare the fare that include extras with the lowest fare plus the extra fees that need to be added to the lowest fare, ending up with the same overall package.

But no doubt, AC expects to make some money on this...
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2017, 8:33 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YOW
Programs: AC*SEMM, *G, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 897
All of a sudden, some of the Flex Flight Pass Pricing for some of the impacted routes is becoming way more attractive... until of course these get adjusted upward
YOWCDNFF is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2017, 9:32 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: AC SE100k, Marriott Titanium, UA Silver
Posts: 2,648
Originally Posted by YOWCDNFF
All of a sudden, some of the Flex Flight Pass Pricing for some of the impacted routes is becoming way more attractive... until of course these get adjusted upward
Dammit don't give them ideas.

Diabeetus is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 9:18 am
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
CBC picking up on some of these issues

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/airl...fare-1.4301505
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 9:45 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,919
Originally Posted by 172pilot
I would assume that the ULCC fares would have their own boarding zone, ie the last one. Real easy to enforce the policy then.
Logical, but is it practical? The domestic flights have a lane for 1-2 and another for 3-5 and it is a tight fit at many gates. Would another lane be added for the "untouchables"? On international, perhaps the no frills customers would be called to board at the end of 5, but I would still anticipate arguments and delays. I do not share your view on the ease of enforcement.

I really am expecting a year or more of negativity and discontent as people purchase the low fare but do not comprehend what it means and we are treated to negative stories in the media, and the sometimes entertaining hissy fits at the gate. There are not enough gate agents to enforce the rules now, how then would they enforce additional draconian rules?

Anyway, we'll see soon enough, but I predict the flights to offer People of Walmart style confrontations will be Rapidair YYZ-YUL, mainland China and India. I'll revisit the topic in a year after the system wide change.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 9:53 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
And to my surprise CBC allows commenting on this article. Most of the comments are against CBC's anti AC propaganda.
songsc is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 10:15 am
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
Originally Posted by songsc
And to my surprise CBC allows commenting on this article. Most of the comments are against CBC's anti AC propaganda.
Actually I did not read the article as particularly anti-AC. Anti-stripped down fares, perhaps, but arguably rightly so.

Plus, I don't really think airlines like the idea all that much, more that they feel they have no choice but bite the bullet.

Ultimately these fares are there by popular demand.

As the article points out, probably misguided. But whose fault?
Stranger is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 11:22 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YYZ
Programs: TK *G
Posts: 3,099
Originally Posted by Stranger
Actually I did not read the article as particularly anti-AC. Anti-stripped down fares, perhaps, but arguably rightly so.
I was referring to the CBC's anti AC propaganda in general. I agree that this specific article isn't directly pointing towards AC.


Originally Posted by Stranger
Plus, I don't really think airlines like the idea all that much, more that they feel they have no choice but bite the bullet.

Ultimately these fares are there by popular demand.

As the article points out, probably misguided. But whose fault?
Well, obviously airlines want everyone to pay full fare J and F, they could do that if they keep the capacity to what they had in the 60s and 70s. The real pressure IMO comes from shareholders. To satisfy shareholders airlines have to increase profits by expanding their customer base, Rouge and all those LCCs under their parent companies are examples.

I think one problem AC isn't handling well is market segregation. Some people still think flying is a luxury, and these people will go to CBC. At the same time, there are people who would like to pay a premium for a luxury (or at least reasonable) flying experience, these people will come here and complain about pickles, cheap wines, salad, chocolate cakes, etc. Air travel market is now segregated, but AC still wants a one size fits all solution. To make more people fly, AC lowers the price by costs cutting, however this costs cutting is company wide and negatively affects the company's culture. With all the downgrading in service and Altitude benefits cut we have seen enough frequent J flyers leaving AC. At the same time, AC markets itself with those fancy PY and J seats pictures luring people to think that AC is a luxury airlines. For non frequent flyers, once they find out the bad attitude from staff and the fact that they have to pay extra for pretty much everything other than the seat, no wondering they rant.

What AC should do IMO is to do what SQ and CX did, create a separate entity that is truely low cost, with different brands, and market them accordingly.
songsc is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 11:37 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BGI (ex-YYC, YYZ)
Programs: AC*G-E100K (once again)
Posts: 1,701
Originally Posted by Diabeetus
With our Concur portal, for YYC-YVR AC flights, it still only shows "Economy" (Tango) and "Latitude" as options. Our "Flex" option is gone.

With WS on Concur though, I can see "Econo", "Flex", "Plus Lowest", and "Plus Flexible".

I'm still showing Flex option on concur... now wondering if it is truly "flex"?

See below...
Attached Images  
cooleddie is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 4:48 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: yyz
Programs: status-free
Posts: 565
I wonder at what point classic aeroplan rewards would start booking into ULC instead of Tango.
biglinguist is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 4:49 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YOW
Programs: AC*SEMM, *G, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 897
Originally Posted by cooleddie
I'm still showing Flex option on concur... now wondering if it is truly "flex"?

See below...
If you click fare rules, it will display the actual fare basis and you can toggle between tango, flex and other classes. Just look for the last two letters of the fare basis (TG or FL) as validation
YOWCDNFF is offline  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 5:26 pm
  #59  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,321
Originally Posted by biglinguist
I wonder at what point classic aeroplan rewards would start booking into ULC instead of Tango.
They don't book into Tango
canadiancow is online now  
Old Sep 24, 2017, 7:47 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
Originally Posted by cooleddie
I'm still showing Flex option on concur... now wondering if it is truly "flex"?

See below...
I mentioned earlier in this thread that Flex is Flex and Tango is Tango.

But if you are presented with just a fare class, you will need to look at the basis codes to distinguish.

Fare Basis Codes

EF = Business Flexible
EL = Business Lowest
PF = Premium Economy Flexible
PL = Premium Economy Lowest
LT = Latitude
FL = Flex
TG = Tango
yyznomad is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.