Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

AC Comments on Proposed Transportation Modernization Act (Passenger Bill of Rights)

AC Comments on Proposed Transportation Modernization Act (Passenger Bill of Rights)

Old May 17, 17, 2:12 pm
  #16  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend and Moderator: Manufactured Spending
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Posts: 55,764
Originally Posted by RCyyz
- establish carrier's obligation for care of transportation of musical instruments
Seen & Noted recently:

http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases...622078873.html

MONTRÉAL, May 12, 2017 /CNW Telbec/ - On 11 May 2017, the International Federation of Musicians (FIM), which represents professional musicians and their trade unions in more than 60 countries, awarded the newly created FIM Airline of Choice award to Air Canada. The ceremony took place during the opening evening of the 4th FIM International Orchestra Conference hosted in Montreal by the Quebec Musicians Guild (local 406 of the AFM).

FIM and its member unions have been campaigning for several years with the aim of improving airlines' policies so that musicians traveling with their instrument are treated fairly and are fully informed about regulations governing the transportation of musical instruments. The international jury set-up by FIM established that the Canadian company was clearly ahead of its competitors in this respect.

According to Benoît Machuel, FIM General Secretary, "Air Canada goes clearly beyond the requirements of the FAA regulation in the US – which today is the benchmark – by offering a 50% discount on a second seat for an instrument when necessary, as well as giving priority boarding to musicians and their instruments. Air Canada's policy towards musicians is in our view exemplary."
tcook052 is offline  
Old May 17, 17, 4:20 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Providence RI
Programs: American Exec Plat, Hyatt Refugeeist, Marriot Gold, Air Canada Cattle Class, Korean Air Morning Plat
Posts: 988
Where is the entity that enforces and takes passengers complaints. What regulatory board will be overseeing AC complies with and compensates passengers in the event of a situation?
The smallest state is offline  
Old May 17, 17, 6:48 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,102
Originally Posted by The smallest state
Where is the entity that enforces and takes passengers complaints. What regulatory board will be overseeing AC complies with and compensates passengers in the event of a situation?
That's the purview of the Canada Transportation Agency. Once Bill C-49 is passed in to law, the CTA will come up with the specifics of the Passenger Bill of Rights and they will (theoretically) enforce it too.

I posted another thread which highlighted the fact that AC currently has 80% of the CTA complaints against Canadian airlines. Another poster demonstrated that the majority of these claims were dismissed by the CTA. So one could draw the conclusion that the CTA is currently only interpreting rules drawn up by the airlines and not making any sort of advocacy for passengers. It obviously remains to be seen how well the CTA will be able to act in the interests of passengers as Bill C-49 is clearly trying to do.
RCyyz is offline  
Old May 17, 17, 6:52 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,102
I hasten to add, that once Bill C-49 receives royal assent, there will likely be a process where interested parties can make representations to the committee which will invariably be struck to examine and make recommendations on the specifics of the Passenger Bill of Rights. Undoubtedly the airlines will send their representatives. I would encourage folks here to keep an open mind and see how we can make constructive recommendations to the committee as well when the time comes.
RCyyz is offline  
Old May 18, 17, 9:24 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Providence RI
Programs: American Exec Plat, Hyatt Refugeeist, Marriot Gold, Air Canada Cattle Class, Korean Air Morning Plat
Posts: 988
Originally Posted by RCyyz
I hasten to add, that once Bill C-49 receives royal assent, there will likely be a process where interested parties can make representations to the committee which will invariably be struck to examine and make recommendations on the specifics of the Passenger Bill of Rights. Undoubtedly the airlines will send their representatives. I would encourage folks here to keep an open mind and see how we can make constructive recommendations to the committee as well when the time comes.
This is a great point RCyyz. A really good point. We need some real world flyers talking to this committee, not a bunch of AC hacks. Gabor Luckas (sp) will be sure to show up, but might be viewed as a characterization of himself.

I'm going to be based in YVR for 12 months at the end of summer so, I will absolutely, positively be passing along my thoughts to the committee. We need the publics voice.
The smallest state is offline  
Old May 18, 17, 9:52 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canada
Programs: Marriott Platinum, IHG Club, Hertz Gold, Aeroplan, Avios, SkyMiles, Thrifty, AMEX
Posts: 985
This thread is starting to sound like an episode of Yes, Prime Minister.
Twickenham is offline  
Old May 19, 17, 6:55 pm
  #22  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend and Moderator: Manufactured Spending
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Posts: 55,764
http://www.fool.ca/2017/05/19/foreig...or-air-canada/

Foreign Investment Rule Changes a Potential Negative for Air Canada
tcook052 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 18, 2:33 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: Anything with sweet spots
Posts: 1,790
Originally Posted by https://airpassengerrights.ca/en/take-action/amend-bill-c-49/tell-your-mp-to-listen-to-the-senate
The Transport Minister has vowed to reject the Senate's amendments to Bill C-49. Senators voted in March to amend the government's bill by:
  • limiting to 90 minutes the time you may be trapped on the tarmac, instead of 3 hours; and
  • keeping consumer advocates doing their work, instead of letting the government silence them.
Why would the Transportation Minister try to prevent Gabor Lukas et al. from defending passenger rights ? It sounds like he cares more about airlines than passengers.
MasterGeek is offline  
Old Apr 12, 18, 3:21 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,131
Originally Posted by MasterGeek
Why would the Transportation Minister try to prevent Gabor Lukas et al. from defending passenger rights ? It sounds like he cares more about airlines than passengers.
He cares more about promoting his own ego than anything else.
Stranger is online now  
Old Apr 12, 18, 3:23 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: YYC
Posts: 4,035
Originally Posted by MasterGeek
Why would the Transportation Minister try to prevent Gabor Lukas et al. from defending passenger rights ? It sounds like he cares more about airlines than passengers.
While it looks bad, it's really about keeping the rules for this topic in line with most other areas of law: you can't sue people for stuff that doesn't impact you.

I can't sue Uber for allowing pervasive sexual harassment of it's employees, because I'm not (and have never been) an employee. But under the SCC ruling, right now I can complain to the CTA or sue Air Canada for having rules that discriminate against [insert topic of choice... obesity, race, age, etc..] despite it not impacting me.

In reality it probably won't change much, except change the name of the cases, as the consumer advocates will just find someone who was impacted to be the plaintiff in their lawsuits. And if they can't find someone, well then perhaps it's not actually an issue and shouldn't be tying up government/court resources.

Last edited by tcook052; Apr 12, 18 at 4:41 pm Reason: off topic political
rehoult is offline  
Old May 28, 18, 12:50 pm
  #26  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: Anything with sweet spots
Posts: 1,790
Air Passenger Rights bill public consultations for consumers

The Canadian Transportation Agency launched public consultations in which air passengers can participate:
Have your say: Air passenger protection Homepage

Time to make Tango passnegers heard and give teeth to passenger rights protections
MasterGeek is offline  
Old May 28, 18, 12:56 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC*E75 (*A Gold), Bonvoy Gold Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,589
You beat me to this, I was just about to post a link to the survey.

The government has been dragging its feet on this much-needed legislation. Let's all fill out the survey so we don't give them an excuse to get it wrong.
MasterGeek likes this.
ffsim is offline  
Old May 28, 18, 1:24 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,131
Originally Posted by MasterGeek

Time to make Tango passnegers heard and give teeth to passenger rights protections
You think we should pay more so airlines can afford to support clueless or argumentative people?
Stranger is online now  
Old May 28, 18, 1:31 pm
  #29  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: AC E50k, A3*G, UA*S, MR Titanium, HHonors Gold, Carlson Gold, NEXUS
Posts: 3,661
I mean, EU airlines have to comply with EU261, and yet their airfares are significantly lower..
MasterGeek likes this.
pewpew is offline  
Old May 28, 18, 2:15 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE MM, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton G,Nexus, Amex MR Plat,IHG Plat
Posts: 4,305
Maybe we should organize a DO and invite them
ffsim likes this.
vernonc is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread