YYZ-YOW Rapidair - now all E90
#91
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
Will be interesting to see what AC ends up doing as it starts to accumulate more data on this new setup.
If they are losing money on this bet, then it won't be long for it to be reverted.
If they are losing money on this bet, then it won't be long for it to be reverted.
#92
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
Are you even reading the thread?
You prefer the E190, who cares. The point isn't how comfortable the aircraft is, it is a 45 min flight in the air, comfort in the aircraft is pretty much irrelevant and not what anyone is complaining about anyway.
You anecdotally saw lighter loads. Congrats. Did you fly on the 6am / 7am / 8am YOW-YYZ? Or the 6pm / 7pm / 8pm / 11pm YYZ-YOW? Because I am pretty sure you did not, those flights are always crammed to capacity, even with the 320, and have been for years.
Again, I'll repeat: They've made (almost) all the YOW-YYZ flights E190s, most likely to save money on basing / crew costs. Sometimes this is fine; YOW-YYZ doesn't need a 320 once an hour all day long. But it certainly needs more than an E190 at peak times, especially with misconnecting pax in YYZ. Operations during peak times are a gong show with 100% full flights, no room for standby / misconnecting pax, AC delaying flights going out to try and catch misconnects because later flights are full, etc. It is a gong show that many of us have witnessed since they made this switch. Your preference for an E190 or the fact you saw some empty seats one time changes none of this.
You prefer the E190, who cares. The point isn't how comfortable the aircraft is, it is a 45 min flight in the air, comfort in the aircraft is pretty much irrelevant and not what anyone is complaining about anyway.
You anecdotally saw lighter loads. Congrats. Did you fly on the 6am / 7am / 8am YOW-YYZ? Or the 6pm / 7pm / 8pm / 11pm YYZ-YOW? Because I am pretty sure you did not, those flights are always crammed to capacity, even with the 320, and have been for years.
Again, I'll repeat: They've made (almost) all the YOW-YYZ flights E190s, most likely to save money on basing / crew costs. Sometimes this is fine; YOW-YYZ doesn't need a 320 once an hour all day long. But it certainly needs more than an E190 at peak times, especially with misconnecting pax in YYZ. Operations during peak times are a gong show with 100% full flights, no room for standby / misconnecting pax, AC delaying flights going out to try and catch misconnects because later flights are full, etc. It is a gong show that many of us have witnessed since they made this switch. Your preference for an E190 or the fact you saw some empty seats one time changes none of this.
I'm not sure how my admitted anecdotal experience is any less valid than your aggressively stated knowledge of the route which is also anecdotal.
WS has for the most part limited their service to Q400s in recent times and passenger numbers show no significant growth. I get that some of the reason there's not growth is that AC isn't showing us love, but part of it is IMO that there's not the traffic as well.
I actually fear for the YOW schedule once the E190s depart the schedule. It will mean less frequencies across the board. I've already noticed deeper schedule reductions at certain times of the year on routes I frequent (e.g. YOW-YEG down to 1/day part of last winter) as those flights have switched to 320 flying.
#93
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ideally YOW, but probably not
Programs: AC SE*MM
Posts: 1,822
I've read every post in the thread as it's progressed and stand by my comments that after many years flying this route regularly, I can only recall a single time or two where I couldn't get a seat on the flight I've wanted either in advance or on standby, which to me means there's no significant shortage of seats. Sure one or two hours a day, certain days may be jammed, but this isn't the case all day everyday.
2) Your experiences over the last few years have nothing to do with the current situation. Yes, with status, you could usually get an SDC or at least a standby seat on an earlier or later flight, we've all experienced this dozens and dozens of times. Have you tried this since the E190 equipment switch? I've failed to do so twice in the last 4 weeks, including once when I was flying in paid J.
#94
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YOW
Programs: AC*SEMM, *G, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 896
Yes, with status, you could usually get an SDC or at least a standby seat on an earlier or later flight, we've all experienced this dozens and dozens of times. Have you tried this since the E190 equipment switch? I've failed to do so twice in the last 4 weeks, including once when I was flying in paid J.
#96
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YOW
Programs: AC*SEMM, *G, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 896
I also see demand softening somewhat for the next few weeks, scanning availability through ExpertFlyer.
The last thing is that AC476 from YYZ ( B763 which then goes to LHR as AC888) often helps to deal with the overflow. It is the one flight that regularly appears to have seats open
#97
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ideally YOW, but probably not
Programs: AC SE*MM
Posts: 1,822
You're right, why have capacity for the benefits you advertise on the route.
YYZ - YOW flights are full of O/D pax who catch an earlier flight and connecting pax who are misconnecting on to a later flight or trying to catch an earlier flight (especially since the MCT at YYZ for US/Int -> Dom is rather long and easy to beat). There can be dozens of people in this situation on any given flight YYZ-YOW, especially in the evening.
I'm expecting AC to have the capacity to handle this situation and provide a benefit they advertise. Especially with their stated policy of giving YOW a handful of direct routes and funneling everything else through YYZ.
#98
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
That's right. AC offers free standby. On a space available basis.
That doesn't mean "we will put a bunch of empty seats on the route so that when you buy a 6pm, you are guaranteed to get on a 4pm or 5pm flight".
But I'm sure we all understand that. We'll just have to wait and see if AC is really losing money and if they revert it.
That doesn't mean "we will put a bunch of empty seats on the route so that when you buy a 6pm, you are guaranteed to get on a 4pm or 5pm flight".
But I'm sure we all understand that. We'll just have to wait and see if AC is really losing money and if they revert it.
#99
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: YYG
Programs: airlines and hotels and rental cars - oh my!
Posts: 2,993
Just my own personal observation, but since AC made YYZ-YOW an E190 route the morning and evening WS flights have been noticeably busier, including the 5:00 pm flight which is a 738 rather than the Encore Q400s they normally use. I've never had problems getting on an earlier flight home from YOW in the past, but it's no longer that easy. The planes are generally full.
I expect the Porter flights are also running full. I guess if you need to be somewhere for 7:00 am, you need to be there for 7:00 am, whether you're earning Errorplan points or not. You have to wonder if AC isn't shooting itself in the foot here by putting so many pax onto competitor's planes. There's no question WS loads on this route are up.
I expect the Porter flights are also running full. I guess if you need to be somewhere for 7:00 am, you need to be there for 7:00 am, whether you're earning Errorplan points or not. You have to wonder if AC isn't shooting itself in the foot here by putting so many pax onto competitor's planes. There's no question WS loads on this route are up.
#100
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: sqrt(-united states of apologist)
Programs: *$ Green
Posts: 5,403
I guess if you need to be somewhere for 7:00 am, you need to be there for 7:00 am, whether you're earning Errorplan points or not. You have to wonder if AC isn't shooting itself in the foot here by putting so many pax onto competitor's planes. There's no question WS loads on this route are up.
That being said, we are all still speculating on what we think ACs numbers are. I could be flying this route 5x weekly and still have 0 clue of what the yield on the route is.
And even at that, this could be temporary while AC works out the 737s and CS100s in the network.
#101
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
#104
Join Date: May 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC-SE100K MM, BA-S HH-D, MB-G LT Sil, IHG-Plt, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 3,801
--
13F
#105
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ideally YOW, but probably not
Programs: AC SE*MM
Posts: 1,822
Choosing direct flights and United instead where it makes more sense.