I was just called by Aeroplan Fraud Protections Department
#31
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: YTZ, YYZ, AMS
Programs: Platinum Zirconium in Life, aeroplan, FB, Avios, IHG
Posts: 603
#32
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: PHX
Programs: AAexp, AC75k, HertzPC, NationalEE, Accor/MariottP, Hilton/HyattG
Posts: 3,614
Minor or not it is still a crime. We simply can't dismiss it and we cannot demand what police should and should not just investigate because we are on a mighty horse that belongs to the "taxpayer". It is not logical to have used the "I am a tax payer, I don't want that or this investigation happening because...well...i am the taxpayer i pay your salary!". Then we should go into the schools and say "don't teach that or don't pick her because I am the taxpayer"
#33
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
Help lower your community's taxes: let your local police detachment know that any possible future complaints from you regarding theft or fraud of the equivalent dollar amount have already been deemed by yourself as "minor crimes" and therefore "little to no use spending the time to investigate it". Tell 'em in advance not to bother.
My point is: the shoe is always on the other foot when it happens to you.
My point is: the shoe is always on the other foot when it happens to you.
I reported a minor theft once about 20 years ago, and when I saw just how futile and expensive the whole exercise was I decided then and then that there is no point in contacting the police for anything other than a major crime.
Who told you that? They're having you on.
I know the prices because I know what I used to bill various PDs and I know what my friends are billing today. BTW, please thank the VPD on my behalf for the generous bar tab my friend covers from time to time thanks to what he bills the VPD for just such silly work.
I think you may be underestimating just how much leg and keyboard work is involved in tracking down something as minor as someones points being stolen.
#34
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
Minor or not it is still a crime. We simply can't dismiss it and we cannot demand what police should and should not just investigate because we are on a mighty horse that belongs to the "taxpayer". It is not logical to have used the "I am a tax payer, I don't want that or this investigation happening because...well...i am the taxpayer i pay your salary!". Then we should go into the schools and say "don't teach that or don't pick her because I am the taxpayer"
You example of education is not applicable here. General education in the public schools is for the greater benefit of society. Finding out how your AP account was compromised benefits no one other than yourself.
#35
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,313
Acts are only illegal if they're investigated and prosecuted.
You're advocating for legalization of theft of 4-5 figures worth of miles.
That astounds me.
You're advocating for legalization of theft of 4-5 figures worth of miles.
That astounds me.
Last edited by canadiancow; Apr 24, 2017 at 5:56 pm Reason: Typo
#36
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE MM, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton G,Nexus, Amex MR Plat,IHG Plat
Posts: 4,422
#37
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
#38
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Minor or not it is still a crime. We simply can't dismiss it and we cannot demand what police should and should not just investigate because we are on a mighty horse that belongs to the "taxpayer". It is not logical to have used the "I am a tax payer, I don't want that or this investigation happening because...well...i am the taxpayer i pay your salary!". Then we should go into the schools and say "don't teach that or don't pick her because I am the taxpayer"
Last edited by mapleg; Apr 24, 2017 at 6:54 pm
#39
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,313
We're not taking about 5 cents.
Someone upthread said 400k miles.
Aeroplan sells these for 3 cents each.
That's $12k.
Someone upthread said 400k miles.
Aeroplan sells these for 3 cents each.
That's $12k.
#40
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Originally Posted by corruptcanadian View Post
Minor or not it is still a crime. We simply can't dismiss it and we cannot demand what police should and should not just investigate because we are on a mighty horse that belongs to the "taxpayer". It is not logical to have used the "I am a tax payer, I don't want that or this investigation happening because...well...i am the taxpayer i pay your salary!". Then we should go into the schools and say "don't teach that or don't pick her because I am the taxpayer"
Minor or not it is still a crime. We simply can't dismiss it and we cannot demand what police should and should not just investigate because we are on a mighty horse that belongs to the "taxpayer". It is not logical to have used the "I am a tax payer, I don't want that or this investigation happening because...well...i am the taxpayer i pay your salary!". Then we should go into the schools and say "don't teach that or don't pick her because I am the taxpayer"
#41
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 41
jaysona: if everyone followed your mindset, that would be the perfect recipe for criminals: perform n times a crime under m$ and no one will come after you.
This is why properly reporting theft/fraud (online or in the real world), even if not in the 5+ figures, is important and useful for cluster these reports and prioritize the cases where a proper investigation is relevant (ie organized group) vs isolated low-impact incident.
Report and let LE decide what to investigate, you are in no position to assume you were victim of a large-scale group or not.
This is why properly reporting theft/fraud (online or in the real world), even if not in the 5+ figures, is important and useful for cluster these reports and prioritize the cases where a proper investigation is relevant (ie organized group) vs isolated low-impact incident.
Report and let LE decide what to investigate, you are in no position to assume you were victim of a large-scale group or not.
#42
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: France
Programs: A3 *G; AC
Posts: 409
Once had my Visa card stolen out of my mailbox. Item bought, taken to a pawn shop, RCMP called as the trade seemed suspicious. RCMP called Visa, Visa called me. Visa agent told me about the usage of the card in real time as the RCMP kept her informed. Guy was caught using a taxi. I went to court over it some time later. Excellent fraud detection etc. None of it instigated by me but rather by Visa and the RCMP. These things are taken seriously.
I would expect to be notified if my Aeroplan account was compromised.
I would expect to be notified if my Aeroplan account was compromised.
#43
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: YVR
Programs: UA Premier Platinum
Posts: 3,759
I would not look at it as $10k spent to recover someone's Aeroplan miles. After all, the miles are already recovered. It is $10k spent to track down a criminal who is quite likely committing other similar crimes and prevent/deter that person from committing other more serious crimes in the future.
The police do not have the resources to thoroughly investigate every minor crime that is reported to them - they make the decision to prioritize after it is reported based on resources as well as the probability of actually making a successful case against someone. If you try to report a $0.05 crime it will not be investigated. If police have actually investigated your complaint and apprehended someone, that should be viewed as an indication that the matter was serious enough to warrant their attention.
The police do not have the resources to thoroughly investigate every minor crime that is reported to them - they make the decision to prioritize after it is reported based on resources as well as the probability of actually making a successful case against someone. If you try to report a $0.05 crime it will not be investigated. If police have actually investigated your complaint and apprehended someone, that should be viewed as an indication that the matter was serious enough to warrant their attention.
#44
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Co-worker had house broken into, number of items stolen. Police asked any suspicions etc.
They said yes, someone their teen son knew who drove a very specific car, and one that the neighbours had reported seeing in the area that day. They gave police the name and address of the suspect.
Net result? Nada. Police did not visit suspect, made no effort to solve the case and told him to contact his insurance company.
That's how the police handle some cases they deem as time wasters. (Not saying it was, but to them it was). Even Sherlock Holmes had to limit the cases he was involved with.
They said yes, someone their teen son knew who drove a very specific car, and one that the neighbours had reported seeing in the area that day. They gave police the name and address of the suspect.
Net result? Nada. Police did not visit suspect, made no effort to solve the case and told him to contact his insurance company.
That's how the police handle some cases they deem as time wasters. (Not saying it was, but to them it was). Even Sherlock Holmes had to limit the cases he was involved with.
#45
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 733
Co-worker had house broken into, number of items stolen. Police asked any suspicions etc.
They said yes, someone their teen son knew who drove a very specific car, and one that the neighbours had reported seeing in the area that day. They gave police the name and address of the suspect.
Net result? Nada. Police did not visit suspect, made no effort to solve the case and told him to contact his insurance company.
That's how the police handle some cases they deem as time wasters. (Not saying it was, but to them it was). Even Sherlock Holmes had to limit the cases he was involved with.
They said yes, someone their teen son knew who drove a very specific car, and one that the neighbours had reported seeing in the area that day. They gave police the name and address of the suspect.
Net result? Nada. Police did not visit suspect, made no effort to solve the case and told him to contact his insurance company.
That's how the police handle some cases they deem as time wasters. (Not saying it was, but to them it was). Even Sherlock Holmes had to limit the cases he was involved with.
Right now, there are a dozen intersections in downtown Montreal of 2-5 police directing traffic due to the inane amount of construction going on. Does it really take 5 police to control traffic on a one-lane street? No, 1 is sitting in the car, two are chatting, one is supervising, and one is actively working. Beyond just prioritizing based on necessity, factors like waste and management are crucial too.
Going back to topic, I do hope the RCMP investigate this. One victim, two victims, eventually many, many victims. This is why we have federal initiatives like the anti fraud centre.