Should we get 1.5 AQS for flying in Business Class
I noticed United Mileplus program provides 1.5 AQS (PQS in United language).
Air Canada seems to mirror United's program in most aspects including the AQS/AQM PLUS AQD. Should Air Canada not be providing 1.5 AQS for flying business and 1.25 for plying PE. |
Who's the unicorn that would help?
|
With ADQ now in place, 100% milage on Tango fares would have more value and be an intelligent and welcome adjustment by AC
|
Tbh I don't know why they just don't scrap AQM and AQS altogether. They are an unnecessary metric to determine who your best customers are.
|
AC's treatment of those buying (non-discounted) J fares is a joke. Not even first choice of meals, largely shunned by concierges, no way of even contacting concierges by phone, limited miles, limited AQS etc etc
While I recognise that we are in the minority on this Board I'd think AC would treat its highest RASK customers better - but no. I'm one that has spent way more than $20K with AC some years but don't even come close to SE. And please don't say that full J customers don't need SE benefits - just having what is left of IKK would make a big difference. |
I would rather AC not mirror UA too much on this as they also have 0 PQS while still 25% PQM for Tango fare. This is the #1 reason and major reasonwhy I didn't move to UA MP.
|
Originally Posted by BrotherBranwell
(Post 25821529)
AC's treatment of those buying (non-discounted) J fares is a joke. Not even first choice of meals, largely shunned by concierges, no way of even contacting concierges by phone, limited miles, limited AQS etc etc
While I recognise that we are in the minority on this Board I'd think AC would treat its highest RASK customers better - but no. I'm one that has spent way more than $20K with AC some years but don't even come close to SE. And please don't say that full J customers don't need SE benefits - just having what is left of IKK would make a big difference. |
Originally Posted by cooleddie
(Post 25821506)
Tbh I don't know why they just don't scrap AQM and AQS altogether. They are an unnecessary metric to determine who your best customers are.
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.666 Mobile Safari/534.8+)
What about 1.5 AQDs for premium cabins? |
Originally Posted by Wpgjetse
(Post 25821683)
There is something about bum time in a seat.
|
Originally Posted by cooleddie
(Post 25821506)
Tbh I don't know why they just don't scrap AQM and AQS altogether. They are an unnecessary metric to determine who your best customers are.
Having AQM and AQS thresholds in addition to a revenue threshold ensures that you're rewarding people who actually fly the airline frequently.
Originally Posted by BrotherBranwell
(Post 25821529)
AC's treatment of those buying (non-discounted) J fares is a joke. Not even first choice of meals, largely shunned by concierges, no way of even contacting concierges by phone, limited miles, limited AQS etc etc
While I recognise that we are in the minority on this Board I'd think AC would treat its highest RASK customers better - but no. I'm one that has spent way more than $20K with AC some years but don't even come close to SE. And please don't say that full J customers don't need SE benefits - just having what is left of IKK would make a big difference. |
You'd want to offer the benefits to them, they would never use them.
|
Originally Posted by RZR
(Post 25822972)
You'd want to offer the benefits to them, they would never use them.
|
Originally Posted by RZR
(Post 25822972)
You'd want to offer the benefits to them, they would never use them.
|
Originally Posted by adam.smith
(Post 25822990)
No, there's no reason to offer them, because they might use them.
Thus you are conditioning SE benefits with money in AC's pocket... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:09 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.