Originally Posted by superangrypenguin
(Post 25305726)
Put on more clothes?
Get another blanket? Ask for a warm beverage? Vodka? |
Originally Posted by Stranger
(Post 25305824)
First, high altitude air needs to be compressed. After that, whether it needed to be heated or cooled is not immediately obvious. May well actually depend upon the flight altitude.
|
Originally Posted by WildcatYXU
(Post 25306052)
Actually, it doesn't. On every aircraft using bleed air (everything except the 787) the air has to be cooled, as the bleed air temperature is around 200C. I don't think anyone would want this to be blown into the cabin. And AFAIK the compressed air in the 787 has to be cooled too.
You may well be right that air needs cooling. It is easy to check. First we would need to go look at the standard atmosphere table, then look at the temperature increase that results from adiabatic compression etc. I'll let someone else do the exercise. :D |
Ever fly TK? I think they set the cabin to "Broil".
Love the airline, seats, food, lounges; but damn does the cabin temp suck! |
Originally Posted by Stranger
(Post 25306157)
Should not make a big difference between bleed air or air from a compressor. In both instances, roughly, consider adiabatic compression.
You may well be right that air needs cooling. It is easy to check. First we would need to go look at the standard atmosphere table, then look at the temperature increase that results from adiabatic compression etc. I'll let someone else do the exercise. :D |
Originally Posted by Dorian
(Post 25305199)
Had my worst ocean crossing in decades on 850 yesterday.
Couldn't sleep at all as the cabin was almost 24c. I asked an FA about it and she said people still had blankets on. In hindsight I wish I'd escalated to the SD. |
Originally Posted by hearna
(Post 25306224)
Dont forget to account for the fact that the aircraft is loosing a lot of heat to the atmosphere ...
But seriously, I would not expect that to be terribly signif9icant in comparison with the effect of adiabatic compression. Admittedly I did not try to work out figures. To start with, one would need data on how well the cabin is insulated. |
Originally Posted by Stranger
(Post 25306157)
Should not make a big difference between bleed air or air from a compressor. In both instances, roughly, consider adiabatic compression.
|
Originally Posted by After Burner
(Post 25306328)
Bleed air IS air from a compressor. Specifically the compression stage of the turbine engine.
BTW, I quickly worked out the figures. Assuming at 11,000 m, conditions to be 217K and 22.6 kPa. Pressurization to 2000 m (might be a bit too high), where pressure is 79.5 kPa. Adiabatic compression for an ideal gas with gamma of 1.4 results in a temperature of around 311 K, i.e. 38C. Now, if compression is not quite ideal, and if pressurization is to an altitude a bit below 2000 m, temperature will end up a bit higher. If using bleed air, I wonder if it might not end up being taken from some compressor stage at a pressure higher than really needed for the cabin? |
Originally Posted by hearna
(Post 25306196)
Ever fly TK? I think they set the cabin to "Broil".
Love the airline, seats, food, lounges; but damn does the cabin temp suck! |
Originally Posted by Stranger
(Post 25306388)
Precisely. :D
BTW, I quickly worked out the figures. Assuming at 11,000 m, conditions to be 217K and 22.6 kPa. Pressurization to 2000 m (might be a bit too high), where pressure is 79.5 kPa. Adiabatic compression for an ideal gas with gamma of 1.4 results in a temperature of around 311 K, i.e. 38C. Now, if compression is not quite ideal, and if pressurization is to an altitude a bit below 2000 m, temperature will end up a bit higher. If using bleed air, I wonder if it might not end up being taken from some compressor stage at a pressure higher than really needed for the cabin? |
Originally Posted by After Burner
(Post 25305452)
I really don't know how this can be solved when one cabin temperature is perfectly comfortable for some and absolute torture for others.
Originally Posted by vernonc
(Post 25305875)
I think if you are too cold that can be solved to a great extent with more clothes and blankets. If you are too hot, not much you can do other than the clothes come off and that's not something I want to see at 30000 feet. So my vote is with the cold is better group.
If I were ever in a situation where the SD said "no, other people are too cold", I would say "Okay, well they can put on another layer or grab a blanket, or I can take my pants off." I've only once had to request the temperature to be lowered though, and that was on LH. The FA was rude about it the whole time. Maybe it's because the entire cabin had mentioned it. |
Originally Posted by After Burner
(Post 25305452)
This is often a problem for me too (guessing >40% of overnight flights). For me, however, the temperature is almost always too low. I really don't know how this can be solved when one cabin temperature is perfectly comfortable for some and absolute torture for others.
Just out of curiosity, how did you know it was 24c? By any chance was it an A330? It's anecdotal but any time I've found the cabin to be too warm it's an A330 and too cold on 767s -- especially window seats. Yup, A330. |
Originally Posted by hearna
(Post 25306196)
Ever fly TK? I think they set the cabin to "Broil".
Love the airline, seats, food, lounges; but damn does the cabin temp suck! |
Does anyone happen to know what the SOP is for cabin temp TATL? (curious)
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:32 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.