Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Air Canada's aging 767-300's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2015, 12:30 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto - YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan/Hilton Gold/Marriott Bonvoy Titanium/Accor/Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 5,899
Originally Posted by rehoult
I'd say the answer is yes, but that it doesn't mean much as fleet purchases tend to run in cycles and western carriers tend to aim for planes to last 25-30 years.

In the 90s, AC had a super low fleet age as they purchased a complete A320 series fleet (replacing 727 and many DC-9), and brought on new B744, B767 and A343 to replace a large part of their widebody fleet. After that, the only really notable changes were the introduction of the 777 in the early 2000s (and subsequent retirement of more of the older widebodies). Given that, the average age just kept going up every year. Now AC is once again entering a major fleet renewal cycle, so you'll see the age plummet as the MAX and 787 enter the fleet and the A320 and 767 leave it. Then the cycle repeats again.

You can see the same south of the border as well. Look at AA's fleet 5 years ago: massive numbers of MDs, 757s and older 767s. Since then they've placed an order to replace their entire narrowbody fleet with NEO and MAX, and are replacing the vast majority of the 767 fleet with 787. By 2020 their average age will probably have dropped by ~10 years. Delta is a similar story. United is a bit more constant on fleet age as they seem to buy random aircraft whenever the mood strikes.
And it's a process that doesn't happen overnight. Withdrawal from service and replacement takes time.
ACYYZ/SD is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2015, 3:14 pm
  #47  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
Originally Posted by upgradesecret
Air Canada has always received sweetheart deals from Boing.
Especially since Boeing thought they had a deal sewn up for 777-200's back whenever and Air Canada realized that they could do better with Airbus 340's instead.
another bad decision.
why fly is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2015, 4:23 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,165
Aren't the 788s slowly replacing the 763s?
I'd guess once all dreamliners are in, all 763s will be gone from the mainline, but this is just a wild guess.
agjil is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2015, 10:12 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Never home.
Posts: 2,971
Originally Posted by why fly
another bad decision.
I wouldn't be so sure. The 777s available in the 90s weren't what AC needed like the 77W/L were years later, and the A340 order led to future A333s which gave AC an aircraft which is still more efficient than 77Es TATL.

Even if AC ordered 77Es they would have likely been replaced by 77Ws by now anyway, and if not AC would be in a worse position than they are now.

Originally Posted by agjil
Aren't the 788s slowly replacing the 763s?
I'd guess once all dreamliners are in, all 763s will be gone from the mainline, but this is just a wild guess.
Yes but the last 787 doesn't arrive until 2019. Internal rumour an AC employee told me (ie don't bet on it happening) is some 763s may even get the latest J seat... but I think just PY is more likely.
winnipegrev is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 4:35 am
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
Question(s): TOiLETTE and Hangul

1. Why do many of the 763 cabins spell/display the french "toilet" as "TOiLETTE" with a lower case "i" and the rest of the letters are upper case?

2. I have witnessed Hangul embossed on the inside of lavatory doors on 763s that I've been on (or, maybe I've been a repeat customer on the same FIN that has this)... are most AC 763s originally from other airlines?
yyznomad is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 6:08 am
  #51  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,511
Originally Posted by yyznomad
1. Why do many of the 763 cabins spell/display the french "toilet" as "TOiLETTE" with a lower case "i" and the rest of the letters are upper case?

2. I have witnessed Hangul embossed on the inside of lavatory doors on 763s that I've been on (or, maybe I've been a repeat customer on the same FIN that has this)... are most AC 763s originally from other airlines?
Of the 20-ish still in the ML fleet, almost all of them came from Canadian. Of those, There are 3 or 4 that Canadian took from Asiana. 3 were delivered directly to AC, but I believe this were part of the original Canadian purchase agreement.
PLeblond is online now  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 7:52 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: YOW
Programs: AC Irrelevant, IHG Platinum, Marriot Gold, Hertz Gold, Avis First
Posts: 273
Age doesn't concern me as much as number of landings and flight hours accumulated. Those numbers I would be interested in seeing.
Cruban is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 8:05 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Programs: AC Elite 50K
Posts: 367
Originally Posted by Cruban
Age doesn't concern me as much as number of landings and flight hours accumulated. Those numbers I would be interested in seeing.
That would be interesting to see. The cycle count is probably quite a bit lower than most aircraft that age. As a fleet its spent a large part of its life operating really long stages. SCL,SAO,GIG (new), LIM, TLV, IST, ATH, PEK, PVG, HKG(not in a long time but it did), NRT, ICN, YYC-NRT.

All of which were operated or are still operated at a decent frequency. Then a lot of Europe. They still to this day do not get much domestic play. And the 67s that did most of the inter North America flights were retired in 2008 (the 767200s) So the 300s havn't been doing the flight very long.

Their hours on the other hand would be very high. They don't stop. Air Canada would need 40 of them to operate them at the frequency many other carriers do.
LittleYHZ is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 8:57 am
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,803
Originally Posted by Cruban
Age doesn't concern me as much as number of landings and flight hours accumulated. Those numbers I would be interested in seeing.
I would bot worry about number of cycles. They fly mostly long haul.

As to hours, in context, these planes are not that old actually.

Real issues are twofold: (1) they look old; and (2) compared with newer models they are not all that efficient.
Stranger is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 10:01 am
  #55  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,511
Originally Posted by Cruban
Age doesn't concern me as much as number of landings and flight hours accumulated. Those numbers I would be interested in seeing.
I would think their cycle count is probably half of the A320s that are basically the same age.

On top of the, the 767 replacement is ongoing. The replacement for the A320 won't start for a few years.
PLeblond is online now  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 11:03 am
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,068
Originally Posted by PLeblond
I would think their cycle count is probably half of the A320s that are basically the same age.

On top of the, the 767 replacement is ongoing. The replacement for the A320 won't start for a few years.
You want cycle counts, try the Dash 100s.

I have 9 segments in 2015 to date on these old ,dirty ,dark and beat up aircraft. They are really showing their age and am hopeful that AC Express finds a suitable replacement soon.
acysb87 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 11:33 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 581
Originally Posted by acysb87
You want cycle counts, try the Dash 100s.

I have 9 segments in 2015 to date on these old ,dirty ,dark and beat up aircraft. They are really showing their age and am hopeful that AC Express finds a suitable replacement soon.
They won't be in the Jazz fleet, current fleet plan is to have Dash8-100s start leaving the fleet shortly and be phased out over the coming years. CPA calls for the smallest plane in the Jazz fleet to be the Dash 8-300s
AC681 is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 12:10 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YQT
Programs: AC, US, AA, UA, BA, QF, DL...
Posts: 463
The Dash 8-300s are pretty shabby too in some cases.
Arcanum is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 12:32 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: YOW
Programs: AC Irrelevant, IHG Platinum, Marriot Gold, Hertz Gold, Avis First
Posts: 273
They better not have exceeded the cycles and hours listed in Figure 6 here: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aer...les/2012_q4/2/
Cruban is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2015, 12:59 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
Originally Posted by Stranger
I would bot worry about number of cycles. They fly mostly long haul.
What's the relation between cycles and long haul/short haul?

Every cycle places stress on the airframe. The length of the flight does not have much play here, other than long haul flights go through fewer cycles in a given time period compared to short haul flights. So, the number of cycles on an airframe still needs to be considered.
jaysona is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.