Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Air Canada | Aeroplan
Reload this Page >

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 19, 2017, 10:25 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: 24left
Jan 18 2021 TC issues Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html

Cabin photos

Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html

Cabin Layout

Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html







- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.

Routes

The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:

YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Print Wikipost

Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2020, 6:14 pm
  #3931  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Looks like a total redesign of the computer systems is being required - buh-bye to a return to service in 2020

https://www.faa.gov/news/media/attac...-R3-8-3-20.pdf
bocastephen is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 5:41 am
  #3932  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,602
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Looks like a total redesign of the computer systems is being required - buh-bye to a return to service in 2020

https://www.faa.gov/news/media/attac...-R3-8-3-20.pdf
Slight exaggeration:This proposed AD would require installing new flight control computer (FCC) software, revising the existing Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to incorporate new and revised flightcrew procedures, installing new MAX display system (MDS) software, changing the horizontal stabilizer trim wire routing installations, completing an angle of attack sensor system test, and performing an operational readiness flight.

This is estimated to be $14000 per aircraft. Southwest, which has the largest number in their fleet, calculates this to be less than $500K. For AC, this would be a total of roughly $336K.

https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/b...&utm_campaign=

That does not seem like a total redesign by any imagination. The public has 45 day to comment on the proposed changes once it is published - the date of publication not yet being announced.
EdmFlyBoi is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 9:11 am
  #3933  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
Originally Posted by EdmFlyBoi
Slight exaggeration:This proposed AD would require installing new flight control computer (FCC) software, revising the existing Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to incorporate new and revised flightcrew procedures, installing new MAX display system (MDS) software, changing the horizontal stabilizer trim wire routing installations, completing an angle of attack sensor system test, and performing an operational readiness flight.

This is estimated to be $14000 per aircraft. Southwest, which has the largest number in their fleet, calculates this to be less than $500K. For AC, this would be a total of roughly $336K.

https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/b...&utm_campaign=

That does not seem like a total redesign by any imagination. The public has 45 day to comment on the proposed changes once it is published - the date of publication not yet being announced.
More to the point, this may well not be enough to satisfy EASA and/or the Canadian authority. Which may well be what AC wishes for...

Arguably this remains merely a better though of bandaid solution. To the satisfaction of Boeing , some US operators, but who else?
Stranger is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 10:59 am
  #3934  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Stranger
More to the point, this may well not be enough to satisfy EASA and/or the Canadian authority. Which may well be what AC wishes for...
Are you suggesting that AC is in bed with TC and will be lobbying TC to make return-to-service requirements stricter than the FAA in an effort to glean more concessions from Boeing and/or cancel (sell back) the -MAX fleet?
YVR72 likes this.
YVRtoYYZ is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 11:48 am
  #3935  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Originally Posted by EdmFlyBoi
Slight exaggeration:This proposed AD would require installing new flight control computer (FCC) software, revising the existing Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to incorporate new and revised flightcrew procedures, installing new MAX display system (MDS) software, changing the horizontal stabilizer trim wire routing installations, completing an angle of attack sensor system test, and performing an operational readiness flight.

This is estimated to be $14000 per aircraft. Southwest, which has the largest number in their fleet, calculates this to be less than $500K. For AC, this would be a total of roughly $336K.

https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/b...&utm_campaign=

That does not seem like a total redesign by any imagination. The public has 45 day to comment on the proposed changes once it is published - the date of publication not yet being announced.
The cost is for implementation - not including the cost to create the new software itself, along with other equipment changes and other costs to prepare for the implementation. It's still a significant undertaking.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 1:27 pm
  #3936  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
Originally Posted by YVRtoYYZ
Are you suggesting that AC is in bed with TC and will be lobbying TC to make return-to-service requirements stricter than the FAA in an effort to glean more concessions from Boeing and/or cancel (sell back) the -MAX fleet?
Not quite going that far, no. Also, lobbying is not necessarily as radical as "being in bed with,"

But just like the FAA surely could not totally ignore that the future of Boeing might be at stake hence not quite going as far as they might have wished, Canadian authorities might not be totally immune to the implications of their decisions. And be more willing to go as far as the FAA might have wished. :-)

And AC might be praying for that... :-)
Stranger is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 2:00 pm
  #3937  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AC SE100K 1MM, FB Platinum, Bonvoy Platinum Elite, IHG Gold Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,602
Originally Posted by bocastephen
The cost is for implementation - not including the cost to create the new software itself, along with other equipment changes and other costs to prepare for the implementation. It's still a significant undertaking.
Implementation of the fixes that were likely tested on the recertification flights, the cost of which has been incurred by Boeing during the redesign phase. Boeing will also likely be picking up the cost of retrofitting existing and to be delivered aircraft. Boeing continues to account for these charges in their quarterly results (as required). As to whether all of this is completed before 2021 is debatable, but it seems likely the aircraft is returning to service in the not too distant future (at least in the US).
EdmFlyBoi is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2020, 7:18 pm
  #3938  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by YVRtoYYZ
Are you suggesting that AC is in bed with TC and will be lobbying TC to make return-to-service requirements stricter than the FAA in an effort to glean more concessions from Boeing and/or cancel (sell back) the -MAX fleet?
A better way of looking at it is TC has am obligation to consult with Canadian industry that may be impacted by its decisions. That would be WS, AC and SW. I could see the Canadian airlines making it clear they don't see any urgency and would be happier with a proper longer term decision rather that a short term stop gap.
Stranger likes this.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2020, 12:55 pm
  #3939  
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,742
Originally Posted by Fiordland
A better way of looking at it is TC has am obligation to consult with Canadian industry that may be impacted by its decisions. That would be WS, AC and SW.
How is Air Namibia impacted by TC's decisions?
Stranger, Twickenham and Bohemian1 like this.
Adam Smith is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2020, 5:27 pm
  #3940  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mississauga Ontario
Posts: 4,094
I'm old enough to remember in a land far away and a time long ago people made fun of me when I said it would be a long, long time before this airplane ever came back. LOL.
martyYOW likes this.
InTheAirGuy is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2020, 6:04 pm
  #3941  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,791
Meanwhile, EASA "has no firm date."

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-b...-idUSKCN2501LC

Plus, article also mentions Canada:

EASA reiterated it would only return the aircraft to service once it felt it was safe.

“In general, good progress has been made but there is still some work which Boeing needs to complete,” the spokeswoman said.

“In the light of this position, and in common with the FAA, we cannot yet predict a firm schedule for the return to service and the ungrounding of the aircraft in Europe.”

EASA scrutiny is one of a number of hurdles to a widespread return to service, including getting Canadian approval and a public comment period of 45 days on the FAA’s proposed changes, as well as finalising a new set of pilot-training procedures.
Stranger is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2020, 6:59 pm
  #3942  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by Adam Smith
How is Air Namibia impacted by TC's decisions?
Should be WG or SWG.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2020, 7:11 pm
  #3943  
Moderator, Air Canada; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM, FB Plat, WS Plat, BA Silver, DL GM, Marriott Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 16,742
Originally Posted by Fiordland
Should be WG or SWG.
I know, was just having a little fun
Fiordland likes this.
Adam Smith is offline  
Old Aug 7, 2020, 5:03 pm
  #3944  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: YVR
Programs: AC E50K, NEXUS
Posts: 645
Originally Posted by bocastephen
The cost is for implementation - not including the cost to create the new software itself, along with other equipment changes and other costs to prepare for the implementation. It's still a significant undertaking.
The new software has already been developed. What do you think was installed in the aircraft that was used for the certification flights? The per-aircraft costs are documented in the FAA NPRM.
EdmFlyBoi likes this.
bimmerdriver is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2020, 12:21 am
  #3945  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Originally Posted by bimmerdriver
The new software has already been developed. What do you think was installed in the aircraft that was used for the certification flights? The per-aircraft costs are documented in the FAA NPRM.
There is still data that likely needs to be analyzed from those flights - the end is nowhere near.
bocastephen is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.