Last edit by: 24left
Jan 18 2021 TC issues Airworthiness Directive for the 737 MAX
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html
Cabin photos
Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html
Cabin Layout
Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html
- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.
Routes
The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:
YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Link to post https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32976892-post4096.html
Cabin photos
Post 976 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29534462-post976.html
Post 1300 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/29780203-post1300.html
Cabin Layout
Interior Specs can be found here https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/home/fly/onboard/fleet.html
- Window seats may feel narrower to come as the armrests are placed "into" the "curvature" of the cabin.
- Seats with no windows feel even more narrower as there is no space created by the curvature of window.
- All bulkhead seats have very limited legroom.
- Seats 15A, 16A, 16F, 17A and 17F have limited windows.
- Exit rows 19 and 20 have more legroom than regular preferred seats.
Routes
The 737 MAX is designated to replace the A320-series. Based on announcements and schedule updates, the following specific routes will be operated by the 737 MAX in future:
YYZ-LAX (periodic flights)
YYZ-SNN (new route)
YUL-DUB (new route)
YYZ/YUL-KEF (replacing Rouge A319)
YYT-LHR (replacing Mainline A319)
YHZ-LHR (replacing Mainline B767)
Hawaii Routes YVR/YYC (replacing Rouge B767)
Many domestic trunk routes (YYZ, YVR, YUL, YYC) now operated by 7M8, replacing A320 family
Air Canada Selects Boeing 737 MAX to Renew Mainline Narrowbody Fleet
#1936
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,804
Wow. How weak and gutless of Transport Canada.
Pandering to unfounded hysteria because a bunch of third world airlines can't train their crews properly. Let's dumb down to their level, shall we?
Once again the human species is displaying that it has not evolved from animals scurrying at the sound of thunder. The gods must be against us and this is their sign.
I'm embarrassed as a Canadian.
Pandering to unfounded hysteria because a bunch of third world airlines can't train their crews properly. Let's dumb down to their level, shall we?
Once again the human species is displaying that it has not evolved from animals scurrying at the sound of thunder. The gods must be against us and this is their sign.
I'm embarrassed as a Canadian.
Nonsense. Boeing had not told anyone their Max had an MCAS and that a wrong aoa signal would trigger it and send their plane into the ground. First or third world. The argument is demeaning.
#1938
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, ON
Programs: AC 75K
Posts: 6,363
#1940
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
Probably the right decision but not a very plausible explanation for why it took so long.
Wonder how long the FAA can hold out. If they do hold out, we might see global airlines leasing 7M8's to US carriers in exchange for 738's being leased back to them.
#1941
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
Why are the black boxes still sitting in Ethiopia?
Caught this rather odd line buried in a Globe and Mail article on Garneau's decision to ban the MAX: "A decision where in Europe to send the black boxes would be taken by Thursday, the airline said."
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...light-control/
... - you'd think given the importance to the many stakeholders about getting to the bottom of this that a decision on where to send black boxes would have been made before they were found and that they would have been sent immediately by fastest available means (including chartered jet) to the lab where they could be analysed. What are they waiting for?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...light-control/
... - you'd think given the importance to the many stakeholders about getting to the bottom of this that a decision on where to send black boxes would have been made before they were found and that they would have been sent immediately by fastest available means (including chartered jet) to the lab where they could be analysed. What are they waiting for?
#1942
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: YCM
Programs: Aeroplan, Marriot, Hilton, IHG, P25K
Posts: 129
Wow. How weak and gutless of Transport Canada.
Pandering to unfounded hysteria because a bunch of third world airlines can't train their crews properly. Let's dumb down to their level, shall we?
Once again the human species is displaying that it has not evolved from animals scurrying at the sound of thunder. The gods must be against us and this is their sign.
I'm embarrassed as a Canadian.
Pandering to unfounded hysteria because a bunch of third world airlines can't train their crews properly. Let's dumb down to their level, shall we?
Once again the human species is displaying that it has not evolved from animals scurrying at the sound of thunder. The gods must be against us and this is their sign.
I'm embarrassed as a Canadian.
It is embarrassing it took this long to protect safety
#1943
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,804
Caught this rather odd line buried in a Globe and Mail article on Garneau's decision to ban the MAX: "A decision where in Europe to send the black boxes would be taken by Thursday, the airline said."
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...light-control/
... - you'd think given the importance to the many stakeholders about getting to the bottom of this that a decision on where to send black boxes would have been made before they were found and that they would have been sent immediately by fastest available means (including chartered jet) to the lab where they could be analysed. What are they waiting for?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...light-control/
... - you'd think given the importance to the many stakeholders about getting to the bottom of this that a decision on where to send black boxes would have been made before they were found and that they would have been sent immediately by fastest available means (including chartered jet) to the lab where they could be analysed. What are they waiting for?
#1944
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
#1945
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
That's a load of crap. The MCAS has been very clearly documented in the initial documentation supplied to operators of the aircraft and Boeing has demonstrated as such. It is up to the operator the define (or outsource) their pilot training programme.
#1946
Join Date: Jul 2017
Programs: AC SE100K
Posts: 12
I was scheduled to fly on the MAX 8 out of YYZ (to SFO) on Saturday morning, so I'm curious what this disruption will mean for that. Nothing has been updated in the itinerary yet. I had another MAX 8 to return with next week, so this is going to be interesting.
#1947
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SJC/YUL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,878
Are you able to cancel or postpone the trip? Something to consider. It's gonna be messy for the next little while
#1948
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Why? Why? Zed! / Why? You? Elle! / Gee! Are You!
Programs: Irrelevant
Posts: 3,543
I guess Garneau was the only one who hadn't noticed the similarities prior to today.
Probably the right decision but not a very plausible explanation for why it took so long.
Wonder how long the FAA can hold out. If they do hold out, we might see global airlines leasing 7M8's to US carriers in exchange for 738's being leased back to them.
Probably the right decision but not a very plausible explanation for why it took so long.
Wonder how long the FAA can hold out. If they do hold out, we might see global airlines leasing 7M8's to US carriers in exchange for 738's being leased back to them.
At this point in time, there is no scientific safety based reason to take such a decision. From a scientific and safety perspective there is only one data point about safety of the 7M8 - the Lion Air crash. Until the FDR and CVR data for the ET crash have been processed, there are no additional safety data points to for which to base a decision.
I'm all for safety, but irrational emotion has no place if the definition and implementation of safety. Safety has to be based on cold hard numbers, not the feelings of the hysterical animals scurrying from the sounds of thunder.
#1949
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,804
At the very least, a number of pilots have complained that the relevant information never made it to their flight operations manual. Nor in the Boeing FCOM.
#1950
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
It could be those "hysterical animals" are on to something.
From the government of Canada:
https://www.canada.ca/en/environment.../overview.html
The first and most important thing to remember is that if you can hear thunder, you are within striking distance of lightning. Take shelter immediately, preferably in a house or all-metal automobile