Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Employer dumping AC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2013, 11:18 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,101
Originally Posted by capebretonboy
Those would be fun airlines to try
I would not refer to KLM or Eva as "fun" airlines CX and Asiana are wonderful though!
mikeyyz is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 11:22 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,393
AC's on-time performance is improving because AC knew it had to improve. As Calin told the annual meeting yesterday, the YTD improvement is on the order of 30+%. (He had a precise number, but I'm not going back over an entire webcast to find it).

Generally speaking, corporate clients can negotiate deals with the airline, and it's possible the OP's company simply negotiated a better deal. It's entirely speculative on my part, but also plausible, that with WJ's push for business traffic they are amenable to larger discounts in private than they would admit to in public. Then, a company might turn around and tell it's employees the switch is for a multitude of reasons, not just cost savings, because some employees would resent losing AC status but might be a bit more understanding if they thought the company had been inconvenienced in other ways, like having employees show up late for meetings or have to pay fare penalties to keep on schedule.
Sebring is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 2:16 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto - YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan/Hilton Gold/Marriott Bonvoy Titanium/Accor/Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 5,899
Originally Posted by capebretonboy
The day I feared has come. My employer has dumped AC as a preferred carrier and is moving all spend over to WS and PD. Reasons stated were uncompetitive fares, weaker on-time performance, lack of credit transfer between employees, and ACs practice of overselling seats. It is truly a sad day because I honestly much, much preferred flying AC.

In a way this is liberating because I will no longer chase status and I can instead try a variety of new airlines both domestically, transborder and international. So I am looking forward to that, but I will miss the game of chasing status and being part of the Star Alliance - the best airline alliance, IMO.

I feel like I am part of a large corporate exodus from AC - or am I just imagining this because it is impacting me so directly?
Nobody likes to lose business, and for the time that you've been with us, I will say honestly that it was truly valued. Large corporate exodus? I have no data, but don't see it. I am rarely on a flight with less than a 98% load factor. After several decades I can pretty much pick out who's on leisure and who's on business. Customers come, and go, and come back again. We'll be waiting with outstretched arms when you're ready

Continued safe travels.
ACYYZ/SD is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 3:44 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 310
ACYYZ i believe you are misinformed. AC itself put out stats showing a big decrease in corporate business. So your several decades of experience seem to have failed you in this case. I know for a fact several corporations who have stopped using AC exclusively due to many factors. Please don't kick someone for stating what was said to them via a corp. My own travel is not economical on AC. it is about 1/3 cheaper to fly down to the USA and fly from there most of the time for my travel. It totally depends on your travel.

As for someone else comparing WJ. first not a WJ fan however AC had the worse on time performance in the industry last year. and as for missing bags mine were lost 4 times last year and once i never got them back and compensation has still not been paid. Not that I am arguing for it actually as I have given up.

the great thing about AC is the upgrades you receive as a FF. if you are below 100k the De-enchancement has really changed the game for you.
todare is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 4:20 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto - YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan/Hilton Gold/Marriott Bonvoy Titanium/Accor/Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 5,899
Originally Posted by todare
ACYYZ Please don't kick someone for stating what was said to them via a corp.
Did you actually read my post?

>Clearly appreciative of this customer and his patronage - now and hopefully back in the future.

>Clearly stated that I have no data which translates to : I'm not an expert in this area.

>Just a few observations that business travel and travellers on business appear to be steady on the flights which I operate.

>Clearly nobody was kicked, but perhaps a pat on the shoulder hoping that whatever dynamics led to his company's departure can be reversed and hopefully have the privilege of earning their business in the future.
ACYYZ/SD is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 5:51 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: LGA
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Marriott Plat Prem., Hilton Gold, National Exec Elite.
Posts: 2,533
Originally Posted by ACYYZ/SD
Did you actually read my post?

>Clearly appreciative of this customer and his patronage - now and hopefully back in the future.

>Clearly stated that I have no data which translates to : I'm not an expert in this area.

>Just a few observations that business travel and travellers on business appear to be steady on the flights which I operate.

>Clearly nobody was kicked, but perhaps a pat on the shoulder hoping that whatever dynamics led to his company's departure can be reversed and hopefully have the privilege of earning their business in the future.
lol, I really don't think he read your post at all... I thought your post was very classy, and consistent with my own observations that flights always seem to be full these days, and that there seem to be a lot of business travelers. Anyway, I got a good chuckle from "todare" - now stop kicking people when they are down
Tedgrrrr is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:17 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan, 50K Altitude, Nexus
Posts: 339
I thought I read that AC has better ontime than West Jet? Maybe that was just out of YYZ? Are these not published numbers somewhere?

Apparently my company pulled AC for its preferred carrier several years ago out of Canada (before my time), now just uses Star Alliance for large corporate meetings or trade shows. Outside of that you are on your own to find a good fare that will get you there, cheaply and on time.
Swarez is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:19 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,297
Originally Posted by danapop
I flew westjet the entire year. This year has been all AC. In my experience AC has had way better on time then WJ and AC has never lost my bags compared to three occasions with WJ last year (although its not a fair stat as I rarely check a bag now do to WJ last year). To be honesty, last year it seemed few and far between that a WJ flight pushed back on time.
ah but lets not get stats get in the way of a great AC is better post

AC in the last two months: 78%
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Flight....do?airline=AC
WS in the last two months: 77%
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Flight....do?airline=ws
PD in the last two months: 76%
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Flight....do?airline=pd

Granted, AC has improved from their overall ratings in the 50%s a few months back.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:36 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by mikeyyz
I would not refer to KLM or Eva as "fun" airlines CX and Asiana are wonderful though!
AMS is a better airport than FRA/LHR IMO.
BR may have changed for the better due to *A but I haven't flown them in a while.
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:38 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,989
Originally Posted by mikeyyz
I would not refer to KLM or Eva as "fun" airlines CX and Asiana are wonderful though!
KLM "The Fun Airline"

Actually once they start installing their new J seats I'll be giving them a try again though. Used to love flying them in the 1980's
Crampedin13A is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:40 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,802
Originally Posted by Crampedin13A
KLM "The Fun Airline"

Actually once they start installing their new J seats I'll be giving them a try again though. Used to love flying them in the 1980's
Don't they still fly MD11s though?
Stranger is online now  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:42 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,802
Originally Posted by mikeyyz
I would not refer to KLM or Eva as "fun" airlines CX and Asiana are wonderful though!
Is BR significantly worse than CX or Asiana? It appears they are pretty good too.

Anyway, flying BR next month, we'll see.
Stranger is online now  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:43 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by mikeyyz
I would not refer to KLM or Eva as "fun" airlines CX and Asiana are wonderful though!
AMS is a better airport than FRA/LHR IMO.
BR may have changed for the better due to *A but I haven't flown them in a while.
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:47 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,989
Originally Posted by Stranger
Don't they still fly MD11s though?
Doubt they will put the new seats in them as I don't think they are going to be in service much longer. I do see the odd KL MD-11 flying overhead of work into YYZ still though. But wouldn't being scared of the aircraft you are on be part of the fun?:
Crampedin13A is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2013, 6:54 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,297
Originally Posted by Stranger
Don't they still fly MD11s though?
The average age of Air Canada's 767 fleet is 19.1 years
http://www.airfleets.net/ageflotte/Air%20Canada.htm
and overall average of AC's fleet is 12.9 years

The average age of KLM's MD-11s is 18.5 years
http://www.airfleets.net/ageflotte/KLM.htm
and overall average of KL's fleet is 9.9 years old
rankourabu is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.