Announcing Air Canada Altitude
#76
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: AC SE MM, too many others
Posts: 1,407
An absolute joke from Air Canada. A total insult to their 50K and under flyers, which I imagine consist mostly of genuine business travellers, not bottom feeder FT mileage runner types whom push to 100K anyway.
If you ever needed a clearer sign to leave Aeroplan, this is it.
#AirCanada #losers #bankrupt
If you ever needed a clearer sign to leave Aeroplan, this is it.
#AirCanada #losers #bankrupt
2. People who "push to 100K" are more likely pax who fly transpac or TATL and not bottom feeders. Odds are that 35-50K pax are domestic or NA. So the changes, in my view, make sense from that perspective. Not sure you can generalize beyond that.
3. To me, the changes are rational when viewed in light of other Star carriers. At least they didn't completely kill benefits at 35K, which they could have done.
4. It is even more reason for FFs to think about supplemental programs that can make up what may have been lost - ie credit cards like AMEX plat.
#78
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AC*SE100K, SPG Gold
Posts: 331
There are no surprises here, except improvements to people who fly more than 75K. I love the fact that super elites can give status to their significant others. My partner is SE and he travels 50% of the time which is pretty hard to the relationship. The new benefits will improve such couples by giving them more comfort and at least some consolation about the fact that their partner travels so much. It is great that they can also upgrade reward tickets with e-upgrades within North america.
My only suggestion is that they if you are super elite and your status designee is already a 50K elite like me, they should push the designee to at least the next level (75K Elite in my case) or give them a status which is equal to current status + 50K.
so a *A would become 50K Elite
*P would become 75K Elite
*E- would become 75K Elite
*E and E+ would become Super Elite
My only suggestion is that they if you are super elite and your status designee is already a 50K elite like me, they should push the designee to at least the next level (75K Elite in my case) or give them a status which is equal to current status + 50K.
so a *A would become 50K Elite
*P would become 75K Elite
*E- would become 75K Elite
*E and E+ would become Super Elite
#79
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,519
Like others had stated, too much info to sink into my head now. But one thing I did say to myself is that I am glad AC actually announce the new tier well in advance. It allow me to plan all trip be as "multi-segments" as possible so I can hit 50 segments. Then to my surprise, due to some of the "interesting" flight pass route offering, I will be 82 segments by end of this year. Now I do like that 50K gift for SE, but too bad I just can't find a way to get 13 more segments with the schedule that I have for the rest of the year.
#80
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Programs: *G
Posts: 2,304
The >11,000 miles eupgrade requirement is obviously intended for TATL/TPAC traffic, not any one UHL segment.
I am disappointed in the 12 eupgrades for SEs at 20K thresholds.
I am also surprised that <50K travellers are surprised since I thought it was obvious in last year's announcement that 35K was going to get reduced privileges. I read the priority seats as bulkheads for all E/SE (but I wish ACV would allow that - they allow all AC E/SE privileges now except bulkhead seats).
For now, my only other comment is that the link in the broadcast email does not work (for me anyway).
I am disappointed in the 12 eupgrades for SEs at 20K thresholds.
I am also surprised that <50K travellers are surprised since I thought it was obvious in last year's announcement that 35K was going to get reduced privileges. I read the priority seats as bulkheads for all E/SE (but I wish ACV would allow that - they allow all AC E/SE privileges now except bulkhead seats).
For now, my only other comment is that the link in the broadcast email does not work (for me anyway).
#81
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 648
again wow
The poor 35-49k loses *G privileges and drops from 45 ecredits to 30!!!
Most 'status' flyers must be in that range ??? lol
What is AC thinking here?.....i can't see how the cost/benefit analyst came up with this? thank goodness i began my migration this year.
Focusing on the wrong things IMO......just WOW
Most 'status' flyers must be in that range ??? lol
What is AC thinking here?.....i can't see how the cost/benefit analyst came up with this? thank goodness i began my migration this year.
Focusing on the wrong things IMO......just WOW
#82
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Programs: UA 1K, AC MM E75, Marriott LT Ti, IHG Dia Amb, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 15,521
There are no surprises here, except improvements to people who fly more than 75K. I love the fact that super elites can give status to their significant others. My partner is SE and he travels 50% of the time which is pretty hard to the relationship. The new benefits will improve such couples by giving them more comfort and at least some consolation about the fact that their partner travels so much. It is great that they can also upgrade reward tickets with e-upgrades within North America
#84
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Programs: *G
Posts: 2,304
My only suggestion is that they if you are super elite and your status designee is already a 50K elite like me, they should push the designee to at least the next level (75K Elite in my case) or give them a status which is equal to current status + 50K.
so a *A would become 50K Elite
*P would become 75K Elite
*E- would become 75K Elite
*E and E+ would become Super Elite
so a *A would become 50K Elite
*P would become 75K Elite
*E- would become 75K Elite
*E and E+ would become Super Elite
#85
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: LGA
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Marriott Plat Prem., Hilton Gold, National Exec Elite.
Posts: 2,533
#86
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: LGA
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Marriott Plat Prem., Hilton Gold, National Exec Elite.
Posts: 2,533
OMG, I misunderstood the checkmark... I assumed that was just a gift lol - so let's say you gift the status to your pet, and you get him to nominate you, and loot all of his eupgrades, that's better than 100% bonus miles and the fees that come with them at redemption time right?
#87
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
That was one of Andrew's favourites too. One SSWU in the old, old days. [His last nail in the coffin...his job is done.] Quite a few take advantage of this as their first MR of the new year for 14 eUpgrade credits each way and about $2K and 1/3rd of the way to SE.
Nothing unexpected. Everything fits into the rationale set out earlier this year when the new tiers were first announced. Fewer eUpgrade credits in circulation will make for better upgrading opportunities. Those who expect to upgrade on every flight will have to get used to the reality that such upgrades are not intended for that purpose. Surprised at the reaction to 35K Elite going to STARSilver. That was a given when the new tiers were previewed. Brings it in line with LH's 35K Frequent Traveler tier...designed for those who fly primarily within NAmerica (and screens out from lounge benefits those who earn it on a couple of international flights to Asia).
The real benefits flow to those at the 75K tier (and SE) who will have a significant upgrading over the old 35K Elite where they were pretty much screwed over. Suppose those who were asking earlier this week if it was worth going for SE can now make the judgement themselves. I think I will stay with my current 82K EQM balance and put the rest of my STAR flights (including some AC ones) into my MP account and go for 75K over there, or even 1K again. (Will easily renew my AA ExecPlat so have that base covered.)
No doubt the tier program is a more solid offering now, and more clearly defined based on how much you fly each year and what those flight patterns are. Is it better? A net assessment would say "No" if compared to MP for a number of benefits I won't go into. The real downside for AE is on the redemption side where award levels for premium flights have gone through the roof, as have the fuel surcharge fees. Hardly an incentive to earn more AE when their value continues to decline.
No doubt many of the more promiscuous will flee AE for A3's program and it's very attractive STARGold tier. They will lose their modest upgrading opportunities, but keep the creature comforts they prefer. But they are not tied to flying AC in any case for business reasons so it matters little.
Suppose the proof will come about this time next year as we see how all of this works out in practice and have some concrete evidence of the good, the bad and the ugly. And maybe a few unknown unknowns!
Nothing unexpected. Everything fits into the rationale set out earlier this year when the new tiers were first announced. Fewer eUpgrade credits in circulation will make for better upgrading opportunities. Those who expect to upgrade on every flight will have to get used to the reality that such upgrades are not intended for that purpose. Surprised at the reaction to 35K Elite going to STARSilver. That was a given when the new tiers were previewed. Brings it in line with LH's 35K Frequent Traveler tier...designed for those who fly primarily within NAmerica (and screens out from lounge benefits those who earn it on a couple of international flights to Asia).
The real benefits flow to those at the 75K tier (and SE) who will have a significant upgrading over the old 35K Elite where they were pretty much screwed over. Suppose those who were asking earlier this week if it was worth going for SE can now make the judgement themselves. I think I will stay with my current 82K EQM balance and put the rest of my STAR flights (including some AC ones) into my MP account and go for 75K over there, or even 1K again. (Will easily renew my AA ExecPlat so have that base covered.)
No doubt the tier program is a more solid offering now, and more clearly defined based on how much you fly each year and what those flight patterns are. Is it better? A net assessment would say "No" if compared to MP for a number of benefits I won't go into. The real downside for AE is on the redemption side where award levels for premium flights have gone through the roof, as have the fuel surcharge fees. Hardly an incentive to earn more AE when their value continues to decline.
No doubt many of the more promiscuous will flee AE for A3's program and it's very attractive STARGold tier. They will lose their modest upgrading opportunities, but keep the creature comforts they prefer. But they are not tied to flying AC in any case for business reasons so it matters little.
Suppose the proof will come about this time next year as we see how all of this works out in practice and have some concrete evidence of the good, the bad and the ugly. And maybe a few unknown unknowns!
#88
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
There only time the 11K+ credits will come into play is when someone is flying two international segments as MG has noted. This could be Asia-SAmerica or Asia-Europe and vice versa, in addition to the Europe-Australia example given. When you consider the mileage involved I have no objection to this change (as I discussed above).
So if these are your only complaints, I'd say the new program will work to your benefit.
#89
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186
#90
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Programs: OWEmerald; STARGold; BonvoyPlat; IHGPlat/Amb; HiltonGold; A|ClubPat; AirMilesPlat
Posts: 38,186