Bottom Feeders
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 491
Bottom Feeders
My guess is that many FFs travel due to work and expense their trips, but accrue the miles associated with the flights. Understandable, when one is making such frequent trips, it would make a substantial difference to have access to lounges, more comfortable seats etc.
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
#2
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
Unfortunately we live in a world where "you get what you paid for"
It's a top tier program, used to be "exclusive". Now it's turned into a college cafeteria. The washroom at times stink like the terminals.
Business class and extra legroom is supposed to generate revenue, not be blocked by all these frequent flier who feels they should be entitled access for free (op up, ecredits etc).
Unfortunately all these things a frequent flier wants cost the airline money and they need to recover by ensuring those people entitled to the extra resources pay top dollar.
A VIP club is designed for a small percentage of attendees and not en masses.
I don't think it's fair to call people bottom feeders, since a yield revenue management model needs both high and low fares/buyers to work. Nonetheless, it is important to reflect the value of what a person has paid for.
Essentially the person that paid $3000 on the same flight and seated next to you, while you paid $1000 has subsidized you $1000, making the average revenue per seat of $2000. If you asked that person "hey you idiot, I paid $2000 less than you" how would he/she feel? But if he/she is entitled to something more because he/she paid more, then it attempts to keep the two of you happy in the long run.
It's a top tier program, used to be "exclusive". Now it's turned into a college cafeteria. The washroom at times stink like the terminals.
Business class and extra legroom is supposed to generate revenue, not be blocked by all these frequent flier who feels they should be entitled access for free (op up, ecredits etc).
Unfortunately all these things a frequent flier wants cost the airline money and they need to recover by ensuring those people entitled to the extra resources pay top dollar.
A VIP club is designed for a small percentage of attendees and not en masses.
I don't think it's fair to call people bottom feeders, since a yield revenue management model needs both high and low fares/buyers to work. Nonetheless, it is important to reflect the value of what a person has paid for.
Essentially the person that paid $3000 on the same flight and seated next to you, while you paid $1000 has subsidized you $1000, making the average revenue per seat of $2000. If you asked that person "hey you idiot, I paid $2000 less than you" how would he/she feel? But if he/she is entitled to something more because he/she paid more, then it attempts to keep the two of you happy in the long run.
Last edited by global happy traveller; Sep 26, 2011 at 9:15 pm
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: AE SE, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,867
My guess is that many FFs travel due to work and expense their trips, but accrue the miles associated with the flights. Understandable, when one is making such frequent trips, it would make a substantial difference to have access to lounges, more comfortable seats etc.
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
#4
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Travelling weekly away from my home, friends, dog and loved one is no luxury. I'd actually rather be at home.
Flying J and F and having access to lounges helps take the grind out of the travel. Having trashed food and washrooms in a lounge wrecks that.
Last week in the HKG RCC two 'first time loungers' took a bottle of white and red to their seating area. Creative, but bottom feeding.
Dorian
Flying J and F and having access to lounges helps take the grind out of the travel. Having trashed food and washrooms in a lounge wrecks that.
Last week in the HKG RCC two 'first time loungers' took a bottle of white and red to their seating area. Creative, but bottom feeding.
Dorian
#5
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: YYC
Posts: 4,035
My guess is that many FFs travel due to work and expense their trips, but accrue the miles associated with the flights. Understandable, when one is making such frequent trips, it would make a substantial difference to have access to lounges, more comfortable seats etc.
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
Some of the posters in this forum seem to support AC's changes which make it more difficult for the so called "bottom feeders," to accrue miles. But why applaud changes that penalize those who fly less often, or perhaps fly in a lower fare bucket?
If many of your potential customers will choose solely based on price, then that is what you have to compete on. So offering, for example, 100% miles for all tickets when your competitors don't, isn't a major competitive advantage (if anything it just hurts your cost basis) because it isn't a factor to those type of customers. Offering a lower ticket price on the other hand, is.
The change allows Air Canada to focus their marketing efforts. T for leisure. T+ at a slight upsell for their FF/general business traveller (note, most corporate contracts with AC book into T+, so this change has no impact). And finally full Y for the specialty market.
Will this change hurt me financially, probably as I'll probably buy up to T+. But as a CA, I've got to say it looks like a well thought out business decision that takes into account the realities of today's airline industry.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: AE SE, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,867
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 491
Unfortunately we live in a world where "you get what you paid for"
It's a top tier program, used to be "exclusive". Now it's turned into a college cafeteria. The washroom at times stink like the terminals.
A VIP club is designed for a small percentage of attendees and not en masses.
It's a top tier program, used to be "exclusive". Now it's turned into a college cafeteria. The washroom at times stink like the terminals.
A VIP club is designed for a small percentage of attendees and not en masses.
#8
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,132
#10
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
First and business class along with top tier packages is intended for those rich/ financially afford it. Doesn't matter where the money comes from (personal or corporate).
It is not a welfare or social service that many think it should. Essentially all these North American carriers with UDU, SWU, Eupgrade have done is diluted their premium market into a glorified walmart (wait that is called target)
Essentially if you pay the lowest fare and you wanted to have additional access to lounges etc then fork it up. That is what the whole strategy is.
I am surprised that Aeroplan did not raise reward redemption mileage further like their Asian and European counterparts.
It is not a welfare or social service that many think it should. Essentially all these North American carriers with UDU, SWU, Eupgrade have done is diluted their premium market into a glorified walmart (wait that is called target)
Essentially if you pay the lowest fare and you wanted to have additional access to lounges etc then fork it up. That is what the whole strategy is.
I am surprised that Aeroplan did not raise reward redemption mileage further like their Asian and European counterparts.
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 491
I'm referring to the ability to earn miles, not the expectation of any kind of elaborate service. Travelling away from home and family every week for weeks on end can't be very enjoyable. So I'm not begrudging the perks that those with status receive. It's just the "better than thou" attitude that sometimes comes across.
#12
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PHL, NYC, DC
Posts: 9,708
You get what you pay for. Like Shell if you pump premium gas you get x3 the Air Miles, if not you get whatever you get, if you gas less than $25 you get 0.
It's not like AC is giving nothing. They are just giving you a fraction of the miles just as you have given them a fraction of a higher or full fare the $ for their seat.
There are two sides of a story, think of the person too that has paid $3000 more sitting next to you.
It's not like AC is giving nothing. They are just giving you a fraction of the miles just as you have given them a fraction of a higher or full fare the $ for their seat.
There are two sides of a story, think of the person too that has paid $3000 more sitting next to you.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YYZ/DLC
Programs: AP, HHonours Diamond
Posts: 3,722
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: AE SE, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,867
Redemtion can be in any class btw. As far as perks, we have priority boarding, check in and seating. Where did u ever come up with the idea that redemprtion is usuallty in E> I hvae never redeemed for an E ticket.