Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Annoyed with Aer Lingus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2018, 3:53 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 725
Annoyed with Aer Lingus

A quick cautionary tale.....

I wanted to book 4 seats on IOM-DUB so I went online and it quoted "only 3 seats left" at £36.99 when I obtained a quote for one passenger. When I obtained a quote for 4 seats it revised the price to 4 x £60.99.

As you might expect I booked three seats at £36.99 and then immediately went back to book the final fourth seat which was £60.99.

Then 12 hours later (overnight) I got a Skyscanner email alert informing me the price was £36.99. So I went to Aer Lingus website and the price for the same flight is £36.99. It now states "4 seats left" at £36.99.



Thanks for reading and hope it helps someone learn something !
lfc84 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2018, 5:31 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: EIDW
Programs: Aer Lingus Concierge, Radisson Rewards Platinum, BW Diamond, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,967
Completely normal and consistent with airline practice globally. Seats are grouped into buckets, and the system gives you the lowest bucket with enough seats for your request, so you got kicked to a higher bucket when looking for 4 seats

I've seen prices drop by hundred+ euro for no apparent reason
nancypants and burnsie21 like this.
ROKNA is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2018, 5:39 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Yes, completely normal. All airlines do this. Actually, I could just repeat what ROKNA wrote!
LondonElite is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2018, 5:25 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Originally Posted by ROKNA
Completely normal and consistent with airline practice globally. Seats are grouped into buckets, and the system gives you the lowest bucket with enough seats for your request, so you got kicked to a higher bucket when looking for 4 seats

I've seen prices drop by hundred+ euro for no apparent reason
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Yes, completely normal. All airlines do this. Actually, I could just repeat what ROKNA wrote!
I’m not sure I agree it’s so straightforward.

We all know airline pricing is a dark art, quant model driven, with dynamic prices that fluctuate for reasons not transparent to the customer.

But when the airline uses the term “x seats remaining at this price” and then within 12 hours x actually turns out to be 2x, then they are arguably deceiving the customer.


Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2018, 10:56 pm
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by Kgmm77
But when the airline uses the term “x seats remaining at this price” and then within 12 hours x actually turns out to be 2x, then they are arguably deceiving the customer.
Your statement is only true if prices only ever go up, rather than down. The fact is that prices, and availability in different fare buckets is highly dynamic. The statement made by the airline is surely true at the time. It could go up, or down, there is no obligation for the airline to keep its earlier pricing in place.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 12:16 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Your statement is only true if prices only ever go up, rather than down. The fact is that prices, and availability in different fare buckets is highly dynamic. The statement made by the airline is surely true at the time. It could go up, or down, there is no obligation for the airline to keep its earlier pricing in place.
I think consumer legislation might not agree, particularly when it appears in this case the airline pricing system almost immediately released additional seats at the same price. I know we speak in terms of buckets, fare classes etc., but these are, for the purposes of consumer rights, irrelevant internal industry terms. They aren’t used on the website and if an airline says only x seats are available at a price (as an inducement not to delay purchase) and this doesn’t hold true for more than a few hours then this is running close to deception IMO. And the “black box” pricing model argument doesn’t cut it as an excuse and hasn’t protected airlines when previous pricing campaigns have fallen foul of consumer regulations.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 12:21 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
How is it any different from a shop telling you that there are currently only 7 litres of milk (expiry tomorrow) available for £1 and then the following day telling you that the milk expiring today is now available for 50p and that the only other available milk expires next week and costs £2?
LondonElite is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 2:31 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,835
Originally Posted by LondonElite
How is it any different from a shop telling you that there are currently only 7 litres of milk (expiry tomorrow) available for £1 and then the following day telling you that the milk expiring today is now available for 50p and that the only other available milk expires next week and costs £2?
I don’t see the same analogy I’m afraid. To me it’s more like they sold out of the milk at €1, someone bought the last of it at €2 and then they found some more in the storeroom and sold that at €1 as the customer walked out the door.

You made the (accurate) point that flight prices don’t increase in a linear fashion. However I’d argue that’s exactly the message that “only x seats left at this prices” is trying to convey to the customer.

Consumer agencies have taken action in the past where airlines didn’t have sufficient seats available to match their advertised fares and I don’t think this is hugely different. The defence that the bucket was closed/empty or fares had been repriced wasn’t acceptable in that case.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 3:02 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I think the point I was trying to make is that milk spoils, and the shop will want to get rid of the older milk faster than the new one. If there is a run on milk, he might jack up the price again, if no one wants it he might lower the price just to get rid of it. Airlines try to fill flights, and have developed reasonably robust predictive technology that allows them to sell at inventory clearing pricing. Sometimes you need to make adjustments because of exogenous events. Sometimes it works out in the consumer's favour, sometimes it doesn't.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 3:50 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 686
mccartje is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2018, 6:30 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Analogies don't work.

OP's error is in saying that he "went back immediately." He did not. Rather, he went back "soon". Sitting at a laptop, it is easy enough to forget that it is a big world out there and that there are tens of thousands of customers out there in that big world.

What is only 30-40 seconds to OP is an eternity. All it took is for one of those tens of thousands of people on OP's flight to have cancelled or changed and that frees up a seat which multi-million Euro software suggests will only sell at the lower price, so that is the price at which it is offered.

It is a perfectly competetive system in which there are some who misjudge just when to purchase. Somewhere there is some person quite happy with their cheaper ticket.
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2018, 7:20 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Programs: BA Gold, Mucci
Posts: 2,065
There are also people specifically employed to manage the revenue on each route. It's also entirely possible that it was a manual change.

All airlines do it, the flight prices will change all the time in response to demand. It usually goes up and up as it gets closer to departure, but not always, as in this case.
FlightDetective is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2018, 4:23 am
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 725
This is an ATR42 service within the UK* and is highly unlikely to have sold another seat on the same flight (next February) between the times of 9pm and 9am....(the 12 hours period overnight that I referred to).

Even now I can buy 6 adult seats at £36.99 for the same flight. It no longer states "4 seats available". Clearly its much more than 6 at that price.

So to charge me £60.99 in the manner described is appalling.

Hopefully that adds context as to why i am still so annoyed.

* CTA and Ireland (should and do know better!)

Last edited by lfc84; Aug 30, 2018 at 9:31 am Reason: UK correction !
lfc84 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2018, 4:56 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 686
Originally Posted by lfc84
within the UK.
IOM-DUB!!??
playing with fire there

Stobart air manage these flights so maybe they are more likely to tweek the fares manually and the OP unfortunately ended up on the wrong side this time. Can certainly understand why the OP is irked by what happened.
Sometimes I think as frequent fliers being aware and familiar of how airlines operate with fares and routes to boost profitability mean we accept possibly too readily the inherent unfairness in the system on customers without stepping back at times and saying hold on this is ridiculous behavior.
Kgmm77, lfc84 and RMDrive like this.
mccartje is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.