A3 ranked #9 airline in the world by Conde Nast
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC/PSP
Programs: AA EXP, A3 Gold
Posts: 4,103
A3 ranked #9 airline in the world by Conde Nast
Not too bad for our little airline...
https://www.cntraveler.com/galleries...oice-awards/12
The caption says A3 plans to expand by more than 50%. Interesting.
https://www.cntraveler.com/galleries...oice-awards/12
The caption says A3 plans to expand by more than 50%. Interesting.
Last edited by justforfun; Oct 20, 2017 at 4:16 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,694
I'd rank it higher
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Paris
Programs: Miles&Bonus *G
Posts: 318
I'd rank it higher
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,694
I did laugh at the Swiss caption. Says something about going for a boutique airline feel rather than a stodgy flag carrier - accompanied by a photo which places them firmly in the "stodgy" category.
And you have to wonder if they could have found a worse photo to use for Emirates...
I think whoever "assembled" that article was having a laugh!!!
And you have to wonder if they could have found a worse photo to use for Emirates...
I think whoever "assembled" that article was having a laugh!!!
#5
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: A3*G
Posts: 40
I'd rank it higher
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
But you must take all these "rankings" with a pinch of salt; the author clearly doesn't know what s/he is talking about.
Here's what they say about KLM (Number 20):
"KLM’s premium economy cabins get rave reviews for seat comfort,"
Not only does KLM *not* have a premium economy cabin; their seat comfort attracts far more complaints than praise.
#6
Not really. A premium economy is usually a different product than just an economy seat with more legroom. All airlines which have something akin to KLM, i.e. an economy seat with more legroom, but without its dedicated cabin, service and fare class are usually very careful to not name it Premium Economy.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,694
Again...they specifically state "Premium Economy cabin". Anyone who has seen KLM's Economy Comfort seats would NOT get every single aspect wrong. It's not a different seat, and it's not a different cabin.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,694
Probably the best flight I ever had was a domestic hop from Auckland down to New Plymouth 6 years ago on a Dash 8; the sole flight attendant was the most engaging, friendly and welcoming staff member I have ever had the pleasure of meeting; she acted as tour guide and welcome ambassador and was an absolute credit not only to the airline, but to the entire country. ^
My only other NZ experience was on a trans-Tasman; one of the big rugby boys in my row had obviously overdone it the night before; he spent a large part of the flight spewing into various sick bags.
My only other NZ experience was on a trans-Tasman; one of the big rugby boys in my row had obviously overdone it the night before; he spent a large part of the flight spewing into various sick bags.
#10
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Programs: British Airways Gold
Posts: 2,635
She is the winner of the Lowell Thomas Award for Investigative Reporting and the Gene DuBois Award for Excellence in Travel and Aviation Reporting.
#12
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 64
Having started my Aegean relationship out of greed (getting gold as easy as possible) a few years ago, the company has slowly convinced me and I easily consider it among the best airlines in Europe. Certainly better than any of the big ones! Everything from onboard service, transfer service, gold hotline service and general friendliness as well as organisation of staff, and last but not least important, attitude when problems arise, is just excellent.
Also, even if I'm no expert in this area, their high utilisation of their economical unity fleet of A320s, seems to save money where it doesn't really hurt anyone involved. When I started using Aegean, I was disappointed they had no longhaul flights, and only flights on weird times to the Middle East. Now I know the reason and hope it doesn't change!
Also, even if I'm no expert in this area, their high utilisation of their economical unity fleet of A320s, seems to save money where it doesn't really hurt anyone involved. When I started using Aegean, I was disappointed they had no longhaul flights, and only flights on weird times to the Middle East. Now I know the reason and hope it doesn't change!
#13
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,342
I really enjoy flying A3. The only problem we ever encounter is the lobby at ATH seems to be complete chaos. However, I've only been there during the morning hours and guessing this is just a surge for all the pax flying to the islands first thing in the morning? Seems like there could be ways for improvement to expedite quicker or increase your counter space with more agents or increased self bag-tag.
#14
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: WAW
Programs: A3(*G), Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 2,534
These are encouraging comments. I’ll have *G via SQ by the end of the year but for next year I think I’d like to go the A3 route as I’m based in the EU and that looks more sustainable (the main reason being the relatively low hurdle for retaining *G).
However, qualifying for A3*G will be quite a bit more work than just retaining it so I will likely have to go the well-trodden route of flying SK to get there. Why is A3 so generous with SK accrual?
However, qualifying for A3*G will be quite a bit more work than just retaining it so I will likely have to go the well-trodden route of flying SK to get there. Why is A3 so generous with SK accrual?
#15
It is the other way around: SK is generous with A3. The operating carrier is the one deciding what to award for all FFP of the alliance. SK went for simplicity: 100% earning on economy for all FFP. Lufthansa went for being a scrooge, as if you notice their logo is not a crane but a vulture