Aegean in talks with Airbus and Boeing for new aircraft [confirmed as Airbus A320neo]
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Paris
Programs: Miles&Bonus *G
Posts: 318
Aegean in talks with Airbus and Boeing for new aircraft [confirmed as Airbus A320neo]
Article is in Greek, so use Google translate if needed.
Επαφές Aegean με Boeing και Airbus για τη προμήθεια νέων αεροσκαφών. Βελτίωση προ φόρων κερδοφορίας
Διαπραγματεύσεις με την Boeing και την Airbus πρόκειται να πραγματοποιήσει, το προσεχές διάστημα, η Aegean Airlines, με στόχο τη προμήθεια νέου στόλου αεροσκαφών.
Επιμέλεια: Μ. Δημητρίου
Η Aegean διαθέτει σήμερα μόνο Airbus (εξαιρείται ο στόλος της Olympic), κάτι το οποίο ίσως να δίνει προβάδισμα στην ευρωπαϊκή εταιρεία, έναντι της αμερικανικής Boeing.
Εάν επιλέξει τη Boeing, η Aegean καλείται να επανεκπαιδεύσει, μερικώς, τους μηχανικούς της, ενώ αλλάζει και ο τύπος των ανταλλακτικών.
Κεντρική επιδίωξη αποτελεί τα νέα αεροσκάφη να έχουν μειωμένη κατανάλωση καυσίμων, με την εταιρεία να δίνει έμφαση στη μέθοδο της μίσθωσης και όχι της αγορά
Διαπραγματεύσεις με την Boeing και την Airbus πρόκειται να πραγματοποιήσει, το προσεχές διάστημα, η Aegean Airlines, με στόχο τη προμήθεια νέου στόλου αεροσκαφών.
Επιμέλεια: Μ. Δημητρίου
Η Aegean διαθέτει σήμερα μόνο Airbus (εξαιρείται ο στόλος της Olympic), κάτι το οποίο ίσως να δίνει προβάδισμα στην ευρωπαϊκή εταιρεία, έναντι της αμερικανικής Boeing.
Εάν επιλέξει τη Boeing, η Aegean καλείται να επανεκπαιδεύσει, μερικώς, τους μηχανικούς της, ενώ αλλάζει και ο τύπος των ανταλλακτικών.
Κεντρική επιδίωξη αποτελεί τα νέα αεροσκάφη να έχουν μειωμένη κατανάλωση καυσίμων, με την εταιρεία να δίνει έμφαση στη μέθοδο της μίσθωσης και όχι της αγορά
Last edited by NWIFlyer; May 11, 2017 at 10:54 am Reason: Reduce to summary from complete article per FT copyright policy
#3
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Heraklion, Greece
Posts: 7,564
#4
Moderator: Aegean Miles+Bonus
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: AMS / ATH
Programs: AFKL Plat, A3 Gold
Posts: 7,338
I'm assuming this is about replacing older/existing aircraft with ones that are more efficient. Especially since the article mention that they are now suffering from overcapacity. Since they lease everything I can imagine that some of the older leases are up for renewal and can be exchanged for other/newer types perhaps..
What does strike me as weird is the inclusion of Boeing. It does not make much sense to me to include B737's on an otherwise only A32x fleet. The costs and overhead to support a completely different aircraft type would be huge. And if lower fuel consumption is the main objection of the change - Airbus has options for that too. The A320 NEO is almost fully compatible with the A320 in every respect (even spare parts). That would be the likely choice for new aircraft I'd think.
What does strike me as weird is the inclusion of Boeing. It does not make much sense to me to include B737's on an otherwise only A32x fleet. The costs and overhead to support a completely different aircraft type would be huge. And if lower fuel consumption is the main objection of the change - Airbus has options for that too. The A320 NEO is almost fully compatible with the A320 in every respect (even spare parts). That would be the likely choice for new aircraft I'd think.
Last edited by Xandrios; May 12, 2017 at 9:54 am
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Paris
Programs: Miles&Bonus *G
Posts: 318
I'm assuming this is about replacing older/existing aircraft with ones that are more efficient. Especially since the article mention that they are now suffering from overcapacity. Since they lease everything I can imagine that some of the older leases are up for renewal and can be exchanged for other/newer types perhaps..
What does strike me as weird is the inclusion of Boeing. It does not make much sense to me to include B737's on an otherwise only A32x fleet. The costs and overhead to support a completely different aircraft type would be huge. And if lower fuel consumption is the main objection of the change - Airbus has options for that too. The A320 NEO is almost fully compatible with the A320 in every respect (even spare parts). That would be the likely choice for new aircraft I'd think.
What does strike me as weird is the inclusion of Boeing. It does not make much sense to me to include B737's on an otherwise only A32x fleet. The costs and overhead to support a completely different aircraft type would be huge. And if lower fuel consumption is the main objection of the change - Airbus has options for that too. The A320 NEO is almost fully compatible with the A320 in every respect (even spare parts). That would be the likely choice for new aircraft I'd think.
Personally, I have a general preference for Airbus as far as comfort goes (though admittedly this is based on my experience on long-haul aircraft).
#7
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
#8
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,403
What does strike me as weird is the inclusion of Boeing. It does not make much sense to me to include B737's on an otherwise only A32x fleet. The costs and overhead to support a completely different aircraft type would be huge. And if lower fuel consumption is the main objection of the change - Airbus has options for that too. The A320 NEO is almost fully compatible with the A320 in every respect (even spare parts). That would be the likely choice for new aircraft I'd think.
#12
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CYUL
Programs: BAEC, A3 M&B
Posts: 92
A321 for the busy, longer LHR and Germany routes. Costs are only slightly higher than the A320 anyway.
CS100 and CS300 for all other routes:
- Unbeatable economics
- Better passenger experience
- Ability to open new markets with the CS100 (i.e Islands to Europe)
- Ability to offer more frequencies
- Performance of the CS100 out of smaller airports
- Seasonal nature of Greek market means that slightly smaller aircraft makes more sense.
CS100 and CS300 for all other routes:
- Unbeatable economics
- Better passenger experience
- Ability to open new markets with the CS100 (i.e Islands to Europe)
- Ability to offer more frequencies
- Performance of the CS100 out of smaller airports
- Seasonal nature of Greek market means that slightly smaller aircraft makes more sense.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Cyprus
Programs: LH SEN, A3*G, TK*G E+, ALL/Accor Plat
Posts: 644
A321 for the busy, longer LHR and Germany routes. Costs are only slightly higher than the A320 anyway.
CS100 and CS300 for all other routes:
- Unbeatable economics
- Better passenger experience
- Ability to open new markets with the CS100 (i.e Islands to Europe)
- Ability to offer more frequencies
- Performance of the CS100 out of smaller airports
- Seasonal nature of Greek market means that slightly smaller aircraft makes more sense.
CS100 and CS300 for all other routes:
- Unbeatable economics
- Better passenger experience
- Ability to open new markets with the CS100 (i.e Islands to Europe)
- Ability to offer more frequencies
- Performance of the CS100 out of smaller airports
- Seasonal nature of Greek market means that slightly smaller aircraft makes more sense.
#14
Moderator: Aegean Miles+Bonus
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: AMS / ATH
Programs: AFKL Plat, A3 Gold
Posts: 7,338
IMO that's SOP when it comes to negotiating. Looking at all available options puts pressure on your previous partner to make you a good deal. And if it happens that Boeing makes them a very good deal, it may be possible that they may switch. For that to happen, Boeing would need to make them a really sweet deal and I don't think that Boeing will do that. They have plenty of customers for the 737.
I sincerely hope they go for the best deal available to them, and not get involved in EU politics in that way. Plenty of other EU operators fly Boeing aircraft, including Air France, so there would be no need to force anybody to buy Airbus.
I'm pretty sure they don't. Perhaps Olympic does?
Keep in mind that the Olympic short-haul fleet are turboprops which, as far as I know, are much more economical than any jet engine (Even though a turboprop technically is also a jet?). These also seat up to 100 pax, which is great for domestic flights.
#15
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CYUL
Programs: BAEC, A3 M&B
Posts: 92
You are perhaps making judgements on Aegean strategy without a full knowledge of the facts. There are many other sectors, like the high-frequency LCA-ATH route, where most flights are heavily booked that could in no way cope with small CS100/300 aircraft. In my opinion, Aegean are short of a few A321 aircraft which could replace the currently used A320 on certain popular routes.
The OA Q400s have 78 seats. CS100 would be 120-125 seats and CS300 145-150. Quite a big gap. And the beauty is, a CS100 could easily and profitably do an ATH-JMK run followed by ATH-DUB. The flexibility is unmatched by anything else out there.