Originally Posted by
tsadude1
Uhmmm...it is part of our job to report suspected drugs. It's in the SOP. Thats why the ruling went the way it did
Since when is SOP law?
As
vassilipan said, it's not law. And just because it's SOP doesn't mean it's legal either.
Furthermore, it revolved around whether he could revoke his consent or not. Maybe I missed something, but I don't see that it was challenged on scope. That's the kind of challenge we really need to see.