Originally Posted by
ND Sol
Some may say that its declaration of the Pledge of Allegiance as unconstitutional was activism since it looked passed the standing issue that the S.Ct. remanded on.
Some would be wrong. Your allegation is they simply ignored the law to be activists. The 9th Cir. didn't ignore the law.
It will be interesting to see what happens in Texas now that the legislature passed a similar addition to the Texas Pledge, which is similarly required to be recited with the Pledge of Allegiance in classrooms.
It will depend if someone challenges it; absent a challenge it won't be tested.