Originally Posted by Martinis at 8
Because a lot of us who are IBOs [independent business operators] use our miles to reinvest in our businesses, there are some very creative ways to do this that can generate significant business profits for us, and at the same time provide a virtually tax free vacation.
True...but the OP did say they like using their miles to upgrade transatlantic, so I was trying to point out the best way to do this. If they use a different program for domestic than transatlantic they will not make mid-tier status with one program, and thus not double their earning potential.
Originally Posted by Martinis at 8
WN restrictions are only on a few days of the year, like Dec 25, etc. on Rapid Rewards tickets. And the more important thing is that the seats are always available. This is not the case with UA/AA because they don't release all seats for redemptions. The worth of $/mile means nothing if there is no seat available.
You are aware of this, right?
"Awards issued on or after February 10, 2006 will have seat restrictions."
In my above post, I did not just state UA/AA were better programs. Rather I mathematically demonstrated how someone can get an
unrestricted (=every seat available) ticket on UA/AA for less round trips than on Southwest (on the applicable route). Or two restricted round trips for the same miles. All Southwest offers
now are restricted round trips; gone are the days of "all seats for redemption."
Originally Posted by Martinis at 8
In addition WN fares are not only cheaper for last minute fares, but their advanced purchases tend to be cheaper.
Please show me the math that supports this assertion (using the relevant city pair). Sample dates: March 27-31
Southwest.com $436.70...all ATA code share connecting in CHI.
AA or UA both offer non stops for $369 at ideal business times.
Originally Posted by Martinis at 8
They have a better program, and as an airline are way more profitable.
True that Southwest turns a profit. How does this benefit the consumer? Southwest takes more from the traveller than it spends on its product; AA/UA don't.
One possible reason for their difference in operating costs would be the amount they spend on a superior product. If the revenue were equal and one spent more on a better product offering, it could affect profits. Profits don't help flyers; only investors. AA/UA are not going to cease service in the next year, so who turns a profit should not be a consideration here.
Southwest's program is very uncompetitive when it comes to trans-cons. If you disagree, please show me where my math is wrong.
Martinis at 8, I respect your opinions, even if you are wrong.
