FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - New "improvements" of M&M 1 April 2006
View Single Post
Old Jan 3, 2006, 3:19 am
  #104  
paffendorf
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 7th planet on your right
Programs: BA[G], SQ[G], TK[G], DL[PM], EY[G], AF[S], IC[Amb], HH[G]
Posts: 1,641
Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer
And as I said before: I do not use an airline because it has requent flyer program but because it carries me from A to B in a reliable, safe, comfortable and friendly way. And to be honest: If I compare LH to any of these insolvent US Chapter 11 Airlines, I feel like being in paradise, especially on domestic or intra-european flights.

Cheers and happy new year,

T.

Hi flying lawyer =)
For the same reasons i avoid to fly LH and i fly SQ! (my work brings me to S.E. Asia)
Ok, LH is better than some US carriers, BUT PLEASE DON'T TRY TO TELL US IT'S A HIGH-STANDARD or A TOP-NOTCH AIRLINE! IMHO it's a fair carrier.

Some carriers DEFINETELY BETTER THAN LH:

SQ - QR - CX - NH - JL - EK - SA - MH - QF - VS - BA - OZ

And finally, why not judging an airline also for some perks, not strictly connected to the flight experience (meant as only on-board experience), but absolutely valuable like FFP benefits?
Personally, when i go to buy a car, i consider also some optionals that are not strictly related to safe drive o speed cruise and so on...

That's obviously my point of view)
bye bye
luke
paffendorf is offline