FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - WOW is AC making a mistake not having E+
View Single Post
Old Feb 19, 2005, 5:43 pm
  #13  
Tractor Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,987
Originally Posted by Al B
For me it's a no-brainer. I look at a couple of rows with UA @ 36-37" knee space which are eligible only for fuller fare or UA preferred pax and then look at the rest of their aircraft with 31". I look at AC with almost every seat row @ 34" -
Depends on your travel patterns I think. UA has a fair bit more than a "couple of rows" of E+, plus will often keep the middle seat free if loads allow. Also ACs seat pitch is only 31-32" on domestic aircraft:

http://www.aircanada.com/en/travelin...incomfort.html

For a 5 hour transcontinental flight if I was in the back, I'd rather be in E+ for sure.

Not sure if this is on seatguru, but does anyone know on ACs 330/340s which seats have 34" and which have less?
Tractor Boy is offline