Originally Posted by
WeekendTraveler
You’ve repeatedly cast doubt on what the OP has stated. Yes, you haven’t specifically used the word “lied”, but you’ve repeatedly cast aspersions about the OP’s truthfulness. There is no justification for doing that.
I don't think we want to get into defining what a liar or a lie is.
I don't think anybody is casting doubt on what the OP has stated.
Let's keep it simple.
It is a fact that there are lot of details missing in the story. For example what the food was that the OP has obviously avoided to say.
There is also no information of the full context of the situation, what the FA did before or after the OP's interaction.
In context with all details, the story may come across VERY differently than the OP's narrative.
Does omitting details make the OP a liar? Who cares? The fact is that there are details missing.'
There are always two sides to a story. That does not make either side a liar. It just two different perspectives of what happened.