Originally Posted by
Cambo
.
An approach to ask questions, understand the situation for both sides and work on a solution acceptable for both parties is a much better approach than pushing "this is what I want, and you have to do that". This is an approach that usually works much better, unless you deal with Putin or so.
what’s the “both sides” perspective when a) you’re contractually
Involuntary Change of Redemption Tickets /regulatory entitled (yes, this term used deliberately) to something and b) you know their script is to deny given you’ve given them months to respond (yes, my own 10.2.2.2 case took from May until Nov when someone offered to pull strings for me, so I’ve been thru six agents one month each getting familiarised with the non-pull script).
walk away?