Originally Posted by
IAN-UK
Indeed. And the surprise extends to the drop-of-a-hat litigious environment that sustains
And expressed by a Subject of the Crown not accustomed to Equal Justice under codified Law.
The Defendant could have voluntarily chosen to fullfill its contract for which it was fully paid the exact amount ( Fare and Taxes ) they demanded, instead of committing unilateral breach without any suggestion of restitution. The Court is the only equalizer, against unequal power, available to an individual.
If TAP was right and acted appropriately, the Court will certainly rule in their favor.