Originally Posted by
HNLbasedFlyer
I disagree, UA has a financial responsibility to its shareholders to survive and cut as much costs as possible. Net new money likely isn't statistically significant - amenities is an easy cost cut and makes sense in this environment.
I'm sure the workers of UA have an appreciation for cuts in hopes it saves their jobs.
Again, this thread is about
CV-19 era in-flight service.
If the cuts are "required", then cut them _and_ notify the flying public - specifically the pages on their website that define the types of services that they are offering going forward. That way those who are flying can properly make their selection based on the travelers own criteria - and not "hoping" that they'll get the services that are currently documented on the web site but not actually being offered.
David
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jul 16, 2020 at 11:30 am
Reason: Discuss the issue, not the poster(s)