FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Hong Kong Consumer Council criticises airlines’ lack of transparency on compensation
Old Dec 16, 2019 | 11:38 pm
  #6  
percysmith
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 22,148
Originally Posted by garykung
And Montreal did specifies the impacted customers has the right to compensate unless the airlines all reasonable measures (or can't take any measures).

So the usual traffic restriction in the Mainland China will be an exception. Typhoon as well. But everything else is not.
Amend 17:19: https://www.iata.org/policy/consumer...-full-text.pdf

"Article 19 — Delay

The carrier is liable for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage by air of passengers, baggage or cargo. Nevertheless, the carrier shall not be liable for damage occasioned by delay if it proves that it and its servants and agents took all measures that could reasonably be required to avoid the damage or that it was impossible for it or them to take such measures."

We know by precedent that this usually means food and drink, accommodation and transportation.

Would be helpful if airlines spell it out, particularly in some CX outstations like EWR where staff just tell pax to fend for themselves.

Also, is "all measures that could reasonably be required" really so complicated to justify "depending on the circumstances"?

Montreal doesn't address cancellations either - for that you have to go to airline CoC.

Last edited by percysmith; Dec 17, 2019 at 2:59 am
percysmith is offline