FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Hong Kong Consumer Council criticises airlines’ lack of transparency on compensation
Old Dec 16, 2019 | 8:12 pm
  #2  
garykung
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
While I support more consumer protections, the Consumer Council's criticism is unwarranted.

1. In the same article, Consumer Council criticizes UA as well (the case of HKG>GUM becoming HKG>HNL>SFO>GUM). However, Consumer Council did not do a fact check, i.e. UA does not fly HKG-HNL, and simply published whatever it thinks. The actual fact was UA asked the impacted passenger to be rebooked on HKG-SFO-HNL-GUM.

2. Many airlines establish compensation policies in light of the law. Because Hong Kong has no such law, I would imagine CX does not have one. Then why would its staffs know if there is none?

The whole article is more like a fiction.
garykung is offline