Originally Posted by
JamesBigglesworth
I wonder under what provision they banned her? As a public trading company you have to serve all paying customers. You can throw someone out at the time if they are doing something they shouldn't, but what legal force does this "We are banning you for one year from using our services"? Are they saying they have trespassed her?
How does the form of ownership, e.g. "public" affect NZ's ability, as a private enterprise, to terminate a customer so long as that termination is not for a prohibited reason?