Originally Posted by
IAH-OIL-TRASH
You can use a screensaver to save as images (jpeg, for example) then upload. Without info from 3rd party witnesses though, it’s your word vs UA’s.
”Not disputing our version of the events” is not the same as agreeing that your version of the event occurred. If they did agree, the issue would have been resolved in your favor at that point.
Point taken. We would have liked that sharing our story would lead to better protections for other passengers.
Originally Posted by
narvik
A shame, but fully understandable. ^
In the end, this is just a silly internet forum where participants were discussing and sharing their opinion[s] about a posted news article.
There's really no need to justify yourselves to any of us. Although I would have liked to hear your thoughts on the accuracy of the Forbes article.
We 'voiced' our impressions of a situation in which we could also find ourselves, and tried to sieve through the information at hand, and imagined how we would have handled it,
provided our opinion on how you handled it, and how the FAs behaved (and subsequently the PIRC).
Not sure providing the documents you mentioned would be particularly beneficial, at this point.
Cheers.
P.S.: By the way, you may want to remove the red color from this part of your message: The red text is untrue.
Understood and thanks.
I do not believe the incident, as long as the UA policies and procedures continue to give its crew the unchecked authority, could have been avoided.
The only inaccuracy in the Forbes article is the part about UA reaching out to us to talk through the incident. UA has made no attempts to resolve the issue.
One confusion was why we had the need to show our BP, which is addressed in point
#7 in our earlier posting.