FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Discussion of InterContinental Hotels in California - as Royal Ambassador
Old Aug 15, 2019, 9:20 am
  #9  
scienm
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Korea, USA
Programs: IC Dia RA / Marriott LT Plat / WOH Globalist / Hilton Diamond / OZ Diamond Plus
Posts: 340
Originally Posted by serendipity1211
In the paper there was a column saying "VIP" and in my case "6" was filled in the column.

I just thought if someone here has had any chance to see that kind of info or someone has any idea about what the column means?
ICs still use a code '6A' as an indicator of RA.

Originally Posted by Tim O'Brien
currently half way through a four night stay at the San Francisco IC, has anyone stayed at both, Mark Hopkins, and the San Fran?

i'd be interested to hear from anyone that's stayed at both to contrast, the better quality property, and generosity fn respect of upgrades?

also any advice re the two LA properties, which is better? headed that way on way to San Diego.
Absolutely recommend IC SF. MH doesn't care RA much.

For LA, IC LA DWTN is the place. But due to the structure of high rise building, suites on high floors are smaller than lower floors one.

Last edited by scienm; Aug 15, 2019 at 9:32 am
scienm is offline