Originally Posted by
MaxVO
Read carefully before firing your barrage of ridicule. The misconduct is not the length of time to process the credit, but backdating it 3 days before it actually happened.
Oh, that wasn't a barrage of ridicule. (And it wasn't even a response to you, but to someone else who has clarified that they agree this is overwrought handwringing.)
I still see no evidence of "misconduct." Often, transactions post on different dates then they were recorded, without any "misconduct." Misconduct is a heavy accusation.