RB211

It is clear to me that:

1. The only information we have is second hand from a single source
2. Even people with zero obvious biases report the same incident differently, sometimes significantly
3. We don't know exactly what was said, how it was said and in what order, or exactly what happened at each point in the incident
4. We will probably never have much more information than we already have, and that information is incomplete and probably unintentionally skewed

And yet we have generated at least 208 further posts on the subject. Now if someone produces video of the incident, or possibly audio, or maybe a first hand account because they were actually there, then further discussion may be fruitful. However, without more concrete information we aren't going to be able to reach any kind of consensus on the subject. Don't let that stop you all from carrying on carrying on, though!

rb211.