Originally Posted by
lincolnjkc
Reading
Wolens further appears to confirm that breach of contract claims are not per se barred by the ADA (and rejects the notion that something "not essential" to aviation would fall outside of the ADA's preemption), but looking at the rules posted on CO's site as of February 2007
[random date] but has the typical escape clause:
But again, I'm not a lawyer
How is that not an illusory contract?