But the property still didn’t offer the advertised services. Some “shortcomings” can be inconveniences and not give 100% satisfaction (as per the guarantee) but that doesn’t mean one must always move property or accept the dissatisfaction in its entirety.

I could argue that if I accepted a move to another Hilton with working lifts, a gym, and no fire alarm, I would then have to put up with the inconvenience of travelling to the original area, which could then be another claim under the guarantee.