Hello, OOP here. Just for clarification, I didn’t “try to play the victim card”. The error in my ways was not knowing that airlines are not responsible for communicating visa rule changes. Based on that incorrect assumption, I felt that I deserved compensation from the airline. I got bashed enough on the other thread to know that I should have no such expectation. The conversation then continued about why India might have introduced a rule that disallows dual transits without a visa, plus the question still stands on whether that rule change actually happened. I have not been able to find any reference to such a change, so as of now, the only reference to that policy change is the words of the AI agent at KTM.