Oh boy, here we go again. Another one-sided post detailing how egregiously a flyer was treated by AC. Of course, it’s not possible that any actions by the flyer (OP’s husband) did anything at all to bring this upon themselves.

Which scenario is more likely?

-Flyer did and said absolutely nothing to bring this on themselves (swearing and raised voices of course are perfectly acceptable when upset). Therefore this is obviously some sort of prejudice.

-Based on behaviour/statements made by flyer, he was determined to be a legitimate risk to fly, per AC’s criteria.

I’m by no means defending AC’s actions as a whole, having been on the receiving end of terrible AC service many times. I would just like to see people taking responsibility for their own actions, and accepting the consequences of same.