Originally Posted by
Kacee
You should try actually reading the EC high court decisions, rather than quick cut and past from third party sites. Because you're wrong.
A third party site that makes its living from submitting EC261 claims. Why would they have an article saying that certain weather issues, including snow, constitute “extraordinary circumstances” and therefore give airlines justification for not paying compensation, if that was not the case? Wouldn’t they be better off encouraging people to submit claims for those situations?