Originally Posted by
guv1976
Except that this wasn't a "drop segment" situation: the traveler was trying to
replace a SEA-OAK segment with a SEA-SFO segment.
But I agree that no mention of co-terminals should have been made. This was simply a permissible routing change on a Partner award, with no change to origin, destination, or carriers.
Is it permissible even though the first segment is on Alaska? I thought I'd heard that having Alaska on the award limits the permissible routing changes.