Old Jun 4, 17, 12:57 pm
  #8  
Jainzar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Programs: AY+, SK EB
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by SK AAR View Post
I'm quite sure that this judgment will be relied on by carriers in the many cases where pax of the subsequent flights file claims for compensation and where the carriers previously have faced the argument that the carrier should have arranged for an alternative aircraft, crew etc. when the incoming aircraft is delayed/cancelled.
It is only the Danish supreme court so this is now only valid in Denmark. Let's see if there will be another ruling in this case which will be binding throughout Europe.
Jainzar is offline