Originally Posted by jackal

I think the title as proposed is awkward and unwieldy. I'm also a bit disappointed at the rush to push out our one and only shot at this motion before I feel that some concerns and details were adequately analyzed and answered. We had a few more days, so I don't understand the rush.

However, despite these issues, I am likely to vote "yes" for this motion as it stands (as I do support the basic idea) and trust that the Community Director will make the necessary fixes in its implementation.