Originally Posted by
arlflyer
So is the moral of the story here that if it seems like you're getting a free lunch on an AA routing rule due to a "unique circumstance", you'd better take a darn close second look at it? That's what I'm taking away; could be way off base though...
That and AAgents (and AA) can't be trusted... Honestly the OP wasn't getting a free lunch, based on the history it seems he had to suffer through several involuntary routing changes...