Plan A didn't go ahead, Plan B was divided in two (2016 savings already decided, 2017 were tbc) - now there is "Plan A+", which is the 2016 savings of Plan B but then some growth as well.
Article in the French press
The fact that the labelling is rather misleading - "A+" implies more growth than "A", where in fact it is rather "A-" or "B+" - is absolutely secondary in the grander context, isn't it?
Oh well...