Originally Posted by
chinatraderjmr
I have a feeling LX is not to blame here. My money is on UA refusing to pay for their customers to use the LX lounge
IMO, that would be a really bad move by United... I can't imagine United selling enough LX F seats to justify unbundling lounge access from the tickets they sell. I'm certainly not a UA apologist, but I don't see paid partner F being a loss-leader for UA, and they certainly shouldn't be skimping on benefits for the few people buying paid F on UA stock these days. I fully blame LX for this one.
Originally Posted by airoli
As part of Atlantic ++, don't LX and UA (and LH OS AC) share revenues and costs on all transatlantic operations anyways?
I'm not sure about the lounge costs-- but they should be sharing revenues.